Teams

Vartanian/Holderness 18s 6.5 Combo W Mon AM

2025 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women 18 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-22vs Tuhro 18s 6.5 Combo W Mon AMLost 02
L#1 DoublesCaroline Walker / Ashley Vartanian vs Teri Bramsway / Natalie Harris1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesFrannie Benfield / Della Crone vs Lynda Guarnieri / Shelly Tuhro3-6, 6-7
2025-08-25vs Tuhro 18s 6.5 Combo W Mon AMLost 03
L#1 DoublesDeb Budler / Caroline Walker vs Natalie Harris / Kelly Guyler2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesFrannie Benfield / Della Crone vs Lynda Guarnieri / Leigh Westbrook6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKerry Spears / Michele Gustavsson vs Sara Adamson / Kate Augustine2-6, 1-6
2025-08-04vs Tuhro 18s 6.5 Combo W Mon AMSplit 11
L#1 DoublesFrannie Benfield / Deb Budler vs Cheryl Scott / Sara Adamson5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesHilary Holderness / Katelyn Chapman vs Tiana Pitts / Lynda Guarnieri6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Anna Mickleberry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Katelyn Chapman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Hilary Holderness
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Marlene Fraticelli
published
3.09
Ashley Vartanian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.08
Frannie Benfield
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Della Crone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Erica Worth
published
2.83
Deb Budler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Michele Gustavsson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.70
Kerry Spears
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Vartanian + Hilary Holderness6256% games+4.5% vs expected
Frannie Benfield + Della Crone2349% games+0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anna Mickleberry
28W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.77
Katelyn Chapman
53W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Hilary Holderness
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Marlene Fraticelli
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
3
Ashley Vartanian
33W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
Frannie Benfield
15W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Della Crone
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Erica Worth
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Deb Budler
4W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Michele Gustavsson
14W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Kerry Spears
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.