Teams

Hills/M. Palmer/40&Over3.5M

2023 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-03vs SVB - T. Vande BergWon 10
W#2 DoublesMax Collazo / Ken Chin vs ROMAN SOBOLEV / Daniel Shields6-1, 6-3
2023-05-20vs Hunter's Greenbacks - M. WarrenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKevin Brick / Doug Clery vs Michael Dasilva / Ken Kranick7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDavid Ponraj vs Jim Johnson7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2023-05-13vs Buckhorn - O. CantuSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKevin Brick / Doug Clery vs Hayrettin Aslan / SHANKAR SELVARAJAN6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDavid Ponraj / Rogerio Buchner de Freitas vs Jeremy Stuart / Christopher Davis6-7, 3-6
2023-05-06vs Temple Terrace Bulls - S. JenkinsWon 20
W#1 DoublesDoug Clery / Kevin Brick vs Michael Costanza / Steven Jenkins6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJames Schneider / Max Collazo vs Robert Chen / Lawrence Palombo6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDoug Clery vs Keval Patel6-1, 6-3
2023-04-15vs TYCC - B. RockwoodWon 10
W#3 DoublesMax Collazo / Michael Palmer vs Brian Rockwood / Cory Frier6-4, 6-2
2023-04-08vs HCC Island Boys - F. RussianWon 20
W#1 DoublesKevin Brick / Doug Clery vs Ryan Hoecker / Benjamin Bee6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDavid Ponraj / Michael Palmer vs Michael Harden / Freddy Russian4-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Doug Clery
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.81
Kevin Brick
published
3.62
Dustin Applebaum
published
3.49
David Ponraj
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.43
Ken Chin
published
3.40
Max Collazo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Chris Chee-A-Tow
published 3.5
3.33
Peter Martino
published
3.33
Michael Palmer
published
Gvozden Dokic
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Brick + Doug Clery8359% games+0.1% vs expected
David Ponraj + Max Collazo7648% games−10.9% vs expected
Ken Chin + Max Collazo404 matchesnot enough data
David Ponraj + Ken Chin213 matchesnot enough data
David Ponraj + Kevin Brick303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Doug Clery
160W–77L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.89
Kevin Brick
13W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
Dustin Applebaum
19W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%20%80%
3.62
Rogerio Buchner de Freitas
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
David Ponraj
172W–79L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.49
Ken Chin
21W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Max Collazo
66W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Chris Chee-A-Tow
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Peter Martino
12W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
Michael Palmer
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Gvozden Dokic
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.