Teams

SD 4.0 Barnes TC (2:2)/ Shirley

2025 Adult 40 & Over Winter - SD WD · SD - Women - 4.0 WD

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-19vs SD 4.0 WTF Barnes- PTC/ LathamLost 01
L#2 DoublesHerta Ixtlahuac / Bea Vega vs Carol Diggs / Marie Hill2-6, 6-7
2025-03-05vs SD 4.0 SDTRC(3:1)/ KauffmanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHerta Ixtlahuac / Tenley Gritts vs Adelle Danson / Soledad Ramirez2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Shirley / Bea Vega vs Krista Losito / Natalie Whitmire6-0, 7-6
2025-02-26vs SD 4.0 SDTRC(3:1)/ HansonLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Shirley / Herta Ixtlahuac vs Annie Chambers / Jennie Blacker2-6, 4-6
2025-02-05vs SD 4.0 Coronado TC/ (3:1) WebsterSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTenley Gritts / Herta Ixtlahuac vs Gladys Esponda / Cristina Rassvetaieff4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBea Vega / Nancy Monica Gomez Lopez vs Jill Webster / Sheryl Munning6-4, 6-4
2025-01-29vs SD 4.0 Coronado HS (2:2)/ HammondLost 02
L#2 DoublesHerta Ixtlahuac / Nancy Monica Gomez Lopez vs Elsie Hammond / Tugce Varol3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBea Vega / Heather Ravenscroft vs Ana Paula Gonzalez / Megan West1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-01-15vs SD 4.0 Mtn View(2:2)/ WunderlyWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Shirley / Bea Vega vs Sun Lee / HONG ZEMAN6-3, 7-6
2025-01-08vs SD WD LLW 4.0 Mtn View/ EscalanteLost 01
L#2 DoublesHerta Ixtlahuac / Bea Vega vs Edna Rendon / Alma Torres2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 4.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Martina Masarani
published
3.64
Tenley Gritts
published
3.43
Herta Ixtlahuac
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.42
Lisa Shirley
published
3.33
3.27
Bea Vega
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.19
Heather Ravenscroft
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Herta Ixtlahuac + Bea Vega1444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martina Masarani
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Tenley Gritts
6W–14L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Herta Ixtlahuac
107W–70L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.43
Lisa Shirley
18W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
Nancy Monica Gomez Lopez
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Bea Vega
154W–161L career · 12 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Heather Ravenscroft
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.