Teams

Jaguars

2026 18&Over Mixed · 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-08vs BUF: Tightly StrungLost 12
L#1 DoublesDarren Stohr / Elisabeth Dexter vs Cheryl Meyer / Trey Sausen3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSouma Chowdhury / Nancy Rehak vs Carl DiNatale / Marnie Belle-Isle6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJad Fares / Hope Ham vs Meagan Doxtad / Alexander Shotell4-6, 0-6
2026-02-27vs BUF: Tightly StrungLost 02
L#1 DoublesSouma Chowdhury / Nancy Rehak vs Wen-Ling Hsu / Ronald White2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesYang Xiao / Shuman Hua vs Kathryn Pasier / Carl DiNatale2-6, 3-6
2026-02-21vs Maple United MixedLost 12
W#1 DoublesFelix Cheng / Xia Karen Gong vs Jason Galbraith / Rachel Hechinger7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesYang Xiao / Shuman Hua vs HUYNHANH LE / Mary-Ann Jolley3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLe Wang / Carol Salvatore vs Mostafa Nouh / Jane Early5-7, 3-6
2026-02-08vs WilbonWon 21
L#1 DoublesJad Fares / Xia Karen Gong vs Eric Schuman / Misty Kaminski2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesElisabeth Dexter / Darren Stohr vs Maddie Robinson / Turhan Wilbon4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLe Wang / Shuman Hua vs June Brennan / Ryan Wills7-5, 6-1
2026-02-06vs The Net MafiaLost 01
L#1 DoublesMeghan Moore / Darren Stohr vs Cynthia Medley-Evanetski / Michael Bupp4-6, 2-6
2026-02-01vs Double ShotsLost 12
L#1 DoublesSouma Chowdhury / Rowena de Perio vs Jacob Hofmar-Glennon / Hayley Hofmar-glennon2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDarren Stohr / Carol Salvatore vs Lei Ying / Rob Udy6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFelix Cheng / Xia Karen Gong vs Jiali Niu / Anthony Yates6-3, 7-5
2026-01-03vs The Net MafiaLost 01
L#3 DoublesDeborah McKnight / Darren Stohr vs Jeff Wagstaff / Teresa Metcalfe6-7, 2-6
2025-12-12vs Double ShotsWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarol Salvatore / Yang Xiao vs Jiali Niu / Jacob Hofmar-Glennon5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Rehak / Souma Chowdhury vs Lei Ying / Anthony Yates6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesXia Karen Gong / Felix Cheng vs Hayley Hofmar-glennon / James Glennon6-1, 6-2
2025-12-07vs Maple United MixedWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Rehak / Le Wang vs Jane Early / Sanjeev Relan2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesElisabeth Dexter / Darren Stohr vs Mary-Ann Jolley / Marc Kabigting6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRowena de Perio / Felix Cheng vs Cheryl Athoe / Mostafa Nouh6-1, 6-2
2025-11-22vs The Net MafiaLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlice Lewis-Hickey / Darren Stohr vs Tanya Zutshi / Michael Bupp3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Felix Cheng
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.74
Darren Stohr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Nancy Rehak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Carol Salvatore
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Souma Chowdhury
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Rowena de Perio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.57
Yang Xiao
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Xia Karen Gong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Hope Ham
published
Elisabeth Dexter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jad Fares
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Le Wang
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Shuman Hua
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yang Xiao + Shuman Hua142946% games+4.5% vs expected
Xia Karen Gong + Le Wang72346% games−4.9% vs expected
Nancy Rehak + Souma Chowdhury224 matchesnot enough data
Souma Chowdhury + Rowena de Perio134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Felix Cheng
26W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Darren Stohr
162W–191L career · 12 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Nancy Rehak
101W–59L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Carol Salvatore
83W–73L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Souma Chowdhury
51W–56L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.70
4
Rowena de Perio
90W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Yang Xiao
101W–78L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
Xia Karen Gong
72W–77L career · 4 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.46
Hope Ham
13W–16L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Elisabeth Dexter
36W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jad Fares
29W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Le Wang
54W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shuman Hua
58W–58L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.