Teams

Triple Crown 25

2026 Tri-Level League · Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.14 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-11vs TerminettersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLynn Wilson / Aubrey Chancellor vs Beverly Rowland / Virginia Kaklamani2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesChloe Martin / Lori Martin vs Claudia Villarreal / TANIA SALAZAR6-0, 6-2
2025-10-10vs Let's Talk About SetsWon 20
W#2 DoublesVeronica Flores / Cynthia Pope vs Mariela Monagas / Dalia Martinez6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEmi McNair / Patti Ramirez vs TANIA SALAZAR / Martha Dellano6-0, 6-1
2025-10-05vs Trio AmigosLost 01
L#2 DoublesLori Martin / Chloe Martin vs Melanie Rossi / JESSICA Sills3-6, 4-6
2025-10-04vs Backhanded ComplimentsWon 10
W#2 DoublesChloe Martin / Faith Horan vs Mary Cirilo / Miranda Hoffpauir6-1, 6-2
2025-10-03vs Backhanded ComplimentsWon 10
W#2 DoublesPingui Tavera / Natalie Pfeiffer vs Mary Cirilo / Miranda Hoffpauir6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Aubrey Chancellor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.46
Bridget Noack
published 4.5
4.30
Catherine Babbitt
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.06
Angela Avila
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.02
Jill Rogers Fitch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.98
Cynthia Pope
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Allison Garcia
published 3.5
3.48
Patti Ramirez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Chloe Martin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.43
Pingui Tavera
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Emi McNair
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Rhonda Stacy
published
Susan Richmond
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Rogers Fitch + Bridget Noack4158% games+6.4% vs expected
Susan Richmond + Catherine Babbitt314 matchesnot enough data
Emi McNair + Rhonda Stacy224 matchesnot enough data
Pingui Tavera + Allison Garcia303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aubrey Chancellor
21W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%43%
4.48
4.5
Bridget Noack
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
4.46
4.5
Catherine Babbitt
53W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
4.30
4.5
Angela Avila
22W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
4.06
Jill Rogers Fitch
50W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Cynthia Pope
15W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
3.5
Allison Garcia
44W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Patti Ramirez
37W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Chloe Martin
16W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Pingui Tavera
19W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
Emi McNair
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Rhonda Stacy
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Susan Richmond
16W–25L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.