Teams

Adult Refund

Adult 18 & Over · Adult Extra Players

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · Adult Extra Players
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Adult Refund000000
2Adult Credit000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Christi Hart
published 4.5
3.89
Jeremy Caslin
published
Beth Hart
published 4
3.71
Lee Page
published
3.68
Sara Ison
published
3.58
Anura Patel
published 3.5
3.46
Kim Wojnowich
published 3.5
3.38
Nancy Moll
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Brandon Pruski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Lori Holcombe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Wojnowich + Anura Patel5162% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Moll + Beth Hart033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christi Hart
7W–20L career · type D · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
Jeremy Caslin
10W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
3.89
4
Beth Hart
24W–18L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lee Page
39W–23L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Sara Ison
10W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.68
3.5
Anura Patel
134W–47L career · no lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.58
3.5
Kim Wojnowich
115W–50L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Nancy Moll
121W–141L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Brandon Pruski
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Lori Holcombe
34W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.