Teams

Lockard/Memphis

2025 Adult 55 & Over-Memphis · 4.0 Women 55 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-27vs Higgins/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesJill Dapremont / Dina Vann vs Kimberly Mitchell / Donna Coffman6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSheila Carro / Andrea Wilkerson vs Anne Higgins / Nancy Goodwin1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLaurita Jackson / Veronica Anthony vs Melony Bratton / Michele Smith4-6, 2-6
2025-04-13vs Schuler/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaurie Lockard / Teresa House-Eley vs Shannon Seay / Gwen Basinger2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Sharp / Andrea Wilkerson vs Silvia Hecht / Dee Pitawanakwat1-6, 1-6
2025-03-23vs Higgins/MemphisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristy Pelt / Dina Vann vs Lisa Edwards / Melinda Hoehn6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJill Dapremont / Andrea Wilkerson vs Jennifer Magee / Michele Smith4-6, 2-6
2025-03-09vs Schuler/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesTeresa House-Eley / Dina Vann vs Deana Templeton / Elizabeth Woodmansee4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJill Dapremont / Veronica Anthony vs Susan Ogg / Shannon Seay2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGwendolyn Ingram / Monika Nenon vs Katharine Schuler / Patricia Wimsatt4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Kristy Pelt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Dina Vann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Sheila Carro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Andrea Wilkerson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Laurita Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Veronica Anthony
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Gwendolyn Ingram
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jacqueline Sharp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jill Dapremont
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Laurie Lockard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Monika Nenon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Teresa House-Eley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristy Pelt
5W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Dina Vann
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
Sheila Carro
24W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Andrea Wilkerson
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laurita Jackson
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Veronica Anthony
13W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.80
Gwendolyn Ingram
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jacqueline Sharp
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jill Dapremont
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laurie Lockard
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Monika Nenon
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Teresa House-Eley
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.