Teams

BENT.Wagner

2025 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-24vs TING.FriedmanLost 01
L#1 SinglesPaula Laine vs Cassandra Lagod1-6, 4-6
2025-11-13vs TOC.SullivanWon 30
W#1 SinglesMegan Wagner vs Esha Modi6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesElissa Plastino vs Grace Miller6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesAmanda Jeffries vs Rebecca Sullivan6-3, 6-3
2025-11-06vs LOCH.AustinWon 10
W#3 SinglesPaula Laine vs Tracey King6-4, 6-1
2025-10-23vs TING.FriedmanLost 01
L#2 SinglesPaula Laine vs Alejandra Monsalve2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-10-16vs TOC.McClureLost 01
L#2 SinglesPaula Laine vs Joey Claussen4-6, 3-6
2025-09-25vs TOC.SullivanWon 21
L#1 SinglesElissa Plastino vs Esha Modi5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesLaura Biber vs Grace Miller6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAmanda Jeffries vs Rebecca Sullivan6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Megan Wagner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.51
Mary Jo Ford
published
2.36
Paula Laine
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.25
Ana Santiago
published 2.5
2.20
Elissa Plastino
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.17
Brittany Rook
published 2.5
2.15
Amanda Jeffries
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Laura Biber
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Jo Ford + Paula Laine033 matchesnot enough data
Mary Jo Ford + Megan Wagner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Wagner
21W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Mary Jo Ford
13W–21L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
2.5
Paula Laine
63W–114L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.36
2.5
Ana Santiago
12W–18L career · no lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.25
Elissa Plastino
5W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Brittany Rook
7W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Amanda Jeffries
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
Laura Biber
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.