Teams

Davis/Piedmont 4.0M Fall Singles Wed PM

2025 Piedmont Fall Singles · 4.0 Men Fall Singles Wed PM

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-22vs Beuchat 4.0M Fall Singles Wed PMLost 02
L#1 SinglesKevin Navarro vs Ajay Goyal4-6, 1-4
L#2 SinglesTan Ren vs Scott Buchanan0-6, 4-6
2025-10-08vs Forehand 4.0M Fall Singles Wed PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesKevin Navarro vs Kyle McCandless6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRobert Lynch vs Chris Leggette0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesTan Ren vs E P Forehand1-6, 3-6
2025-10-01vs Beuchat 4.0M Fall Singles Wed PMLost 02
L#2 SinglesTan Ren vs Alexis Beuchat1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesMatthew Cochran vs Rodrigo Lara0-6, 1-6
2025-09-24vs Wellons 4.0M Fall Singles Wed PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesCorey Davis vs Rob Newman3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesRobert Lynch vs Scott Wellons7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesTan Ren vs William Allen6-3, 6-0
2025-09-17vs Forehand 4.0M Fall Singles Wed PMLost 12
W#1 SinglesCorey Davis vs Scot Harrison4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTan Ren vs Charles Chuang1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesMatthew Cochran vs E P Forehand0-6, 3-6
2025-09-10vs Beuchat 4.0M Fall Singles Wed PMLost 02
L#2 SinglesKevin Navarro vs Alexis Beuchat0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesTan Ren vs Ajay Goyal4-6, 3-6
2025-09-03vs Wellons 4.0M Fall Singles Wed PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesCorey Davis vs Matthew Fridell7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTan Ren vs Nicholas Holloman0-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesKevin Navarro vs William Allen6-3, 6-3
2025-08-27vs Forehand 4.0M Fall Singles Wed PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesKevin Navarro vs Charles Chuang5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesScott Wallace vs Kyle McCandless5-7, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMatthew Cochran vs Chris Leggette1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men Fall Singles Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Corey Davis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.51
Kevin Navarro
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
3.46
Matthew Cochran
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.46
Scott Wallace
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.46
Robert Lynch
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.21
Tan Ren
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Corey Davis
45W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Kevin Navarro
4W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Matthew Cochran
13W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Scott Wallace
15W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
Robert Lynch
16W–33L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Tan Ren
20W–35L career · 12 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.