Teams

Apex:Maganti

2024 ME Adult 55 & Over Men · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-13vs Apex:WoodsLost 02
L#1 DoublesH Terence Hampson / Steven Buxton vs Roger Gagne / Stephan Woods2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Barrett / Kirk Farrar vs Scott Steinberg / David Champoux3-6, 1-6
2024-07-13vs Apex:WoodsWon 21
W#1 DoublesDustin Nelson / Kirk Farrar vs Roger Gagne / Richard McLeod6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrian Mavor / Jeffrey Barrett vs Stephan Woods / David Champoux1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSteven Buxton / H Terence Hampson vs Jerome Faure / Steven Richard7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-06-25vs Apex:WoodsLost 03
L#1 DoublesSteven Buxton / Michael Samson vs Stephan Woods / David Champoux4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Barrett / Kirk Farrar vs Marc Chadbourne / Ronald Chicoine6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesScott Mann / Mark Woodbury vs Robert Disch / Scott Steinberg0-6, 0-6
2024-06-15vs Apex:WoodsLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Mann / Mark Woodbury vs Ronald Chicoine / Scott Steinberg3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Samson / Kirk Farrar vs Richard Pickering / Roger Gagne2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Barrett / H Terence Hampson vs Richard McLeod / Scott Hardy3-6, 4-6
2024-06-15vs Apex:WoodsLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Mann / Mark Woodbury vs Ronald Chicoine / Scott Hardy4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Barrett / Kirk Farrar vs Richard McLeod / Scott Steinberg3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDustin Nelson / John Cameron vs Steven Richard / Richard Pickering4-6, 4-6
2024-06-05vs Apex:WoodsLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Samson / Mark Woodbury vs Jerome Faure / Steven Richard7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesH Terence Hampson / Jeffrey Barrett vs John Cannon / Robert Disch0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDustin Nelson / John Cameron vs Marc Chadbourne / David Champoux6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Apex:Woods511537103
2Apex:Maganti1531532202

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brian Mavor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Mark Woodbury
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.46
H Terence Hampson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.42
John Cameron
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Steven Buxton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Scott Mann
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Jeffrey Barrett
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.13
Kirk Farrar
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Edmund Melhado
published
Michael Samson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Barrett + Kirk Farrar033 matchesnot enough data
Mark Woodbury + Scott Mann033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Mavor
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Mark Woodbury
69W–55L career · 4 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
H Terence Hampson
95W–120L career · 4 lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
3.46
John Cameron
29W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%72%27%
3.42
Steven Buxton
114W–99L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Scott Mann
32W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Jeffrey Barrett
9W–14L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Kirk Farrar
21W–27L career · 5 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
Edmund Melhado
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Samson
43W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.