Teams

SH - Minshew

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-23vs Proctor Tri-LevelWon 30
W#1 DoublesThomas Minshew / Chad Oakley vs Kevin Strickland / Hudson Hatfield6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael Gulley / William Leffel vs Christopher Proctor / Timmy Ross7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBret Waldrep / Chad Gault vs Joey Rushing / Kevin Stone6-3, 6-1
2026-07-16vs Proctor Tri-LevelWon 20
W#2 DoublesMichael Gulley / Daniel Romine vs Carlos Liotta / Timmy Ross6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChad Gault / Jonathan Scogin vs Kevin Stone / Kevin Busler6-0, 6-3
2026-07-16vs Proctor Tri-LevelWon 20
W#1 DoublesWilliam Leffel / Daniel Romine vs David Cooper / Beau Tanner6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichael Gulley / Abraham Marchant vs Carlos Liotta / Christopher Proctor6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-29vs Proctor Tri-LevelWon 30
W#1 DoublesTeddy Champion / Chad Oakley vs Kevin Strickland / Timmy Ross6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAbraham Marchant / Fleet Willoughby vs Carlos Liotta / Beau Tanner6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJonathan Scogin / Chad Gault vs Joey Rushing / Charles Joiner6-2, 6-0
2026-06-25vs Proctor Tri-LevelWon 30
W#1 DoublesChad Oakley / Neal Barker vs Hudson Hatfield / Wesley Swoopes6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichael Gulley / Daniel Romine vs Joey Rushing / David Cooper6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChad Gault / Jonathan Scogin vs Charles Joiner / Donald Anderson6-2, 6-2
2026-06-18vs Proctor Tri-LevelWon 30
W#1 DoublesNeal Barker / Teddy Champion vs Kevin Strickland / Carlos Liotta6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAbraham Marchant / Bret Waldrep vs Christopher Proctor / Kevin Stone6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJonathan Scogin / Chad Gault vs Kevin Busler / David Cooper6-4, 6-0
2026-06-08vs Proctor Tri-LevelWon 30
W#1 DoublesAbraham Marchant / Fleet Willoughby vs Kevin Strickland / Timmy Ross1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBret Waldrep / Daniel Romine vs Carlos Liotta / Beau Tanner6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChad Gault / William Leffel vs David Cooper / Donald Anderson6-2, 6-0
2026-06-04vs Proctor Tri-LevelWon 30
W#1 DoublesThomas Minshew / Teddy Champion vs Kevin Strickland / Reece Carson6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAbraham Marchant / Fleet Willoughby vs Joey Rushing / Christopher Proctor6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChad Gault / Bret Waldrep vs Kevin Stone / Charles Joiner6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SH - Minshew702015100
2Proctor Tri-Level0702142249

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Chad Oakley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Neal Barker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Thomas Minshew
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Teddy Champion
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Michael Gulley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Fleet Willoughby
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Abraham Marchant
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Daniel Romine
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.17
William Leffel
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Bret Waldrep
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Jonathan Scogin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Chad Gault
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Minshew + Chad Oakley404 matchesnot enough data
Chad Gault + Jonathan Scogin404 matchesnot enough data
Fleet Willoughby + Abraham Marchant303 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Minshew + Teddy Champion303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chad Oakley
16W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
4.02
Neal Barker
10W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.89
Thomas Minshew
13W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
3.86
Teddy Champion
29W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.79
Michael Gulley
4W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.72
3.5
Fleet Willoughby
23W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Abraham Marchant
5W–0L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Daniel Romine
4W–0L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.21
William Leffel
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.17
3
Bret Waldrep
9W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.08
Jonathan Scogin
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.86
2.5
Chad Gault
7W–0L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.