Teams

WI Tri Delta W Fall Singles MALT Bishop

2024 WI Other · WI Tri Delta Fall Singles Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →

Flight standings for WI Tri Delta Fall Singles Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Megan Prahl
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 28% · published
3.03
Gwen Finnegan
usually #2 Singles 90%, also #3 Singles 10% · published
3.02
Anna Krylova
usually #3 Singles 32%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 3
2.89
Amy Bishop
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.42
Nicole Desjardins
usually #2 Singles 53%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
Katie Meyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Prahl
100W–45L career · 24 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.96
Gwen Finnegan
17W–31L career · 10 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Anna Krylova
51W–94L career · 19 lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Amy Bishop
52W–81L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
2.89
Nicole Desjardins
11W–29L career · 16 lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
2.42
Katie Meyer
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.