Teams

Honey Deuces

Spring Adult 18 & Over WeekEND · Ladies 5.0

7 players · average NTRP 5.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-12vs love y'allWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatherine Wallin / Stacy Marks vs ALEXANDRA KHADZHYAN / Lindsey Pesqueira2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesPeyton Brotzman vs Christina Tollemache6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAnna Eberhardt / Erin Portman vs Bianca Vitale / Emma Cox6-2, 6-1
2026-07-10vs love y'allLost 12
L#1 DoublesStacy Marks / Amy McCampbell vs Gabrielle Francis / Christina Tollemache3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesPeyton Brotzman vs Lindsey Pesqueira1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAlina Mihailescu / Katherine Wallin vs Savannah Bryson / Emma Cox6-3, 6-2
2026-06-07vs love y'allLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatherine Wallin / Stacy Marks vs Gabrielle Francis / Viktoriya Paul3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPeyton Brotzman vs Bianca Vitale1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnna Eberhardt / Erin Portman vs Savannah Bryson / Lindsey Pesqueira6-4, 6-1
2026-05-16vs love y'allLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlina Mihailescu / Katherine Wallin vs ALEXANDRA KHADZHYAN / Christina Tollemache6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPeyton Brotzman vs Bianca Vitale3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnna Eberhardt / Erin Portman vs Gabrielle Francis / Savannah Bryson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-05-09vs love y'allLost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Portman / Katherine Wallin vs ALEXANDRA KHADZHYAN / Gabrielle Francis6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPeyton Brotzman vs Bianca Vitale2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesStacy Marks / Amy McCampbell vs Emma Cox / Christina Tollemache6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.80
Erin Portman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.79
Alina Mihailescu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.79
Anna Eberhardt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.78
Amy McCampbell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.74
Peyton Brotzman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.54
Katherine Wallin
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.29
Stacy Marks
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Portman + Anna Eberhardt18368% games+8.5% vs expected
Stacy Marks + Katherine Wallin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Erin Portman
66W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.80
5
Alina Mihailescu
8W–9L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
4.79
5
Anna Eberhardt
33W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
4.79
5
Amy McCampbell
4W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
4.78
Peyton Brotzman
14W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
4.74
Katherine Wallin
28W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
4.54
Stacy Marks
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
4.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.