Teams

MTS:Constantin

2024 NH Adult 55 & Over Men · 7.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-11vs NPT:Deacon:ArnoldWon 30
W#1 DoublesJames Scammon / Bill Best vs JEFFREY DEACON / Dan Junius3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRichard Aseltine / Scott Herstad vs Stephen Dunn / Bradley Truax6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJames Constantin / Christopher Murphy vs Edward Hoyt / Jeffrey Paul6-3, 6-2
2024-04-27vs BOSS:Rougive:NabingerWon 21
W#1 DoublesScott Herstad / James Scammon vs Radu Stan / Thomas Villars6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGary Mountford / Christopher Murphy vs Robert Nabinger / Michael Fokas6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesPeter Podesta / Terry Gould vs Rod Lovely / Tom Csatari4-6, 4-6
2024-04-06vs ALG:SrGaloots:Leo:DeglerLost 12
L#1 DoublesRichard Aseltine / Scott Herstad vs Jeffrey Stone / Joseph Proulx0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJames Scammon / Gary Mountford vs Timothy Hannan / Glenn Leo3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTerry Gould / Christopher Murphy vs Robert Normandin / William Berry2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-03-30vs TC:Leichtman:HaightLost 12
L#1 DoublesTerry Gould / Richard Aseltine vs Gary Myler / Mark Bernier3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGary Mountford / James Scammon vs Toni Stamenov / Richard Barnett6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPeter Podesta / James Constantin vs David Haight / Todd Goldenberg4-6, 1-6
2024-03-16vs TC:Leichtman:HaightWon 21
W#1 DoublesRichard Aseltine / Scott Herstad vs Brett Gibson / Mark Bernier6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPeter Podesta / Christopher Murphy vs Bruce Leichtman / Todd Goldenberg6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesScott Rappeport / Terry Gould vs Gary Myler / David Haight2-6, 3-6
2024-03-02vs NPT:Deacon:ArnoldWon 30
W#1 DoublesRichard Aseltine / Scott Herstad vs Stephen Dunn / David Stephens6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTerry Gould / Christopher Murphy vs Christopher Arnold / Edward Hoyt6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPeter Podesta / Scott Rappeport vs Bradley Truax / Steve Gunnerson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-02-17vs BOSS:Rougive:NabingerWon 21
L#1 DoublesJames Scammon / Bill Best vs Radu Stan / Doug Phillips4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRichard Aseltine / Scott Herstad vs Timothy McKean / Thomas Villars0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPeter Podesta / Christopher Murphy vs Michael Fokas / Cliff Eskey6-4, 6-2
2024-02-03vs ALG:SrGaloots:Leo:DeglerLost 12
L#1 DoublesScott Herstad / Richard Aseltine vs Joseph Proulx / Jeffrey Degler1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJames Scammon / Bill Best vs Mitchell Weissberg / William Frank6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPeter Podesta / Scott Rappeport vs Kenneth Gould / Joseph Mello2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Christopher Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Bill Best
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Gary Mountford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Scott Herstad
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.26
James Scammon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Peter Podesta
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.11
Terry Gould
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.08
Richard Aseltine
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
James Constantin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Rappeport
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Reid
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Scammon + Bill Best12458% games+3.8% vs expected
Peter Podesta + Terry Gould7652% games+3.3% vs expected
Richard Aseltine + Terry Gould7750% games+1.6% vs expected
Richard Aseltine + Scott Herstad141249% games−2.2% vs expected
Peter Podesta + Gary Mountford3446% games−4.5% vs expected
Richard Aseltine + Peter Podesta71048% games−6.9% vs expected
Peter Podesta + Scott Rappeport5347% gamesnot enough data
James Scammon + Scott Herstad3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christopher Murphy
23W–22L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.44
3.5
Bill Best
29W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
Gary Mountford
34W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Scott Herstad
91W–79L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
James Scammon
33W–31L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
Peter Podesta
53W–86L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Terry Gould
86W–131L career · 5 lines in 2024
22%77%<1%
3.11
Richard Aseltine
50W–61L career · 7 lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
3.08
James Constantin
21W–42L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Rappeport
12W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Reid
4W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.