Teams

Wingman

Adult 40 and over · 4.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-09-04vs Golden WingsLost 03
L#1 DoublesAustin Hertzog / Cesar Pernia vs Gary Davidowich / Sean McElroy4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBen Waters vs Yuya Ikeda1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMatt Zaun / Todd Geiser vs Justin Greenlee / DAISUKE SUZUKI0-6, 0-6
2026-08-29vs Golden WingsLost 03
L#1 DoublesCesar Pernia / Matt Zaun vs AJ Garabedian / Richard Young7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAustin Hertzog vs DAISUKE SUZUKI3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTodd Geiser / Ben Waters vs Lance Heil / Sean McElroy1-6, 4-6
2026-08-16vs Golden WingsLost 12
L#1 DoublesAustin Hertzog / Andres Zirlinger vs Richard Young / SCOTT ZANON7-6, 2-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTodd Geiser / Julien Sauvagnargues vs Ko Kiuchi / Ronald Fletcher3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBen Waters / Matt Zaun vs Manan Pandya / Henry Chen7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-02vs Golden WingsLost 02
L#1 SinglesAndres Zirlinger vs Felipe Munoz4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBen Waters / Matt Zaun vs SCOTT ZANON / Lance Heil4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Golden Wings0271446
2Wingman02171595

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Austin Hertzog
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.91
Jason Guillen
published
3.88
Ben Waters
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.87
Matt Zaun
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.83
Andres Zirlinger
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Julien Sauvagnargues
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.71
Todd Geiser
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
Peter Valentin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ben Waters + Matt Zaun4158% games+7.3% vs expected
Austin Hertzog + Andres Zirlinger224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Austin Hertzog
25W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.00
Jason Guillen
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
3.91
4
Ben Waters
119W–59L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
Matt Zaun
70W–35L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Andres Zirlinger
11W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.83
Julien Sauvagnargues
7W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Todd Geiser
68W–66L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.71
Peter Valentin
55W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.