Teams

KENT

2023 OKCTri-Level 18 & Over · WOMEN 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.33 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-25vs OK/Shouse/Tri18&over5.0-4.5-4.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMichelle Rojano / Arlette Rojano vs Abby Harless / Andrea Tomlin6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRhonda Lincoln / Amy Kent vs Anne McKinney / Erin Wood3-6, 3-6
2023-03-05vs OK/Shouse/Tri18&over5.0-4.5-4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesWaverly Wituski / Caitlyn Sagraves vs Emily K Pomeroy / Elizabeta Abramovic2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Mastin / Annie Hale vs Abby Harless / Kaily Ghilea4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRhonda Lincoln / Maya Kelley vs Anne McKinney / Erin Wood3-6, 1-6
2023-02-19vs OK/Shouse/Tri18&over5.0-4.5-4.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesWaverly Wituski / Brittany Parks vs Leah Jacob / Jamie Shouse6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaya Kelley / Annie Hale vs Michele Hill / Emily Pomeroy2-6, 3-6
2023-02-11vs OK/Shouse/Tri18&over5.0-4.5-4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesWaverly Wituski / Brittany Parks vs Jamie Shouse / Emily K Pomeroy6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Warren / Michelle Rojano vs Amy Mueller / Andrea Tomlin1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Kent / Rhonda Lincoln vs Jolinda Holt / Kaily Ghilea1-6, 3-6
2023-02-05vs OK/Shouse/Tri18&over5.0-4.5-4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBrittany Parks / Arlette Rojano vs Leah Jacob / Emily K Pomeroy2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAnnie Hale / Sarah Mastin vs Michele Hill / Abby Harless1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMaya Kelley / Jacqualine Bufford vs Anne McKinney / Jolinda Holt5-7, 3-6
2023-01-22vs OK/Shouse/Tri18&over5.0-4.5-4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesWaverly Wituski / Arlette Rojano vs Leah Jacob / Jamie Shouse0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Warren / Michelle Rojano vs Emily Pomeroy / Abby Harless4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRhonda Lincoln / Jacqualine Bufford vs Kaily Ghilea / Erin Wood3-6, 5-7
2023-01-15vs OK/Shouse/Tri18&over5.0-4.5-4.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesWaverly Wituski / Brittany Parks vs Emily K Pomeroy / Elizabeta Abramovic3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Rojano / Annie Hale vs Amy Mueller / Andrea Tomlin0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Mastin / Maya Kelley vs Anne McKinney / Jolinda Holt7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brittany Parks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Arlette Rojano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.89
Caitlyn Sagraves
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.87
Jacqualine Bufford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Annie Hale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Amy Kent
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.21
Rhonda Lincoln
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Warren
published
Maya Kelley
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Michelle Rojano
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sarah Mastin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Waverly Wituski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqualine Bufford + Sarah Mastin11852% games+3.1% vs expected
Michelle Rojano + Caitlyn Sagraves3339% games−14.2% vs expected
Amy Kent + Caitlyn Sagraves123 matchesnot enough data
Waverly Wituski + Brittany Parks033 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Rojano + Jennifer Warren033 matchesnot enough data
Annie Hale + Sarah Mastin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Brittany Parks
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Arlette Rojano
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Caitlyn Sagraves
23W–34L career · 5 lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.89
4
Jacqualine Bufford
85W–71L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Annie Hale
0W–9L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Amy Kent
23W–55L career · 2 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
Rhonda Lincoln
106W–120L career · 6 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Jennifer Warren
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maya Kelley
5W–19L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Rojano
19W–51L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Mastin
29W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Waverly Wituski
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.