Teams

Pell City -Tumlin

2025 Ann · Gadsden

14 players · average NTRP 3.43 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Gadsden have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Craig Tumlin
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.47
Brandall Wright
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
David Weir
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.33
David Leonard
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Jimmy Warren
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.13
Charlie Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Billy Le
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.77
Alex Stennis
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 3
John J Moore
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
LaMont Stokes
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Camp
usually #1 Doubles 72%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Michael Dobbs
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Steve Hicks
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
Thomas Leonard
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Weir + Jimmy Warren4639% gamesnot enough data
LaMont Stokes + Billy Le4354% gamesnot enough data
Craig Tumlin + Thomas Leonard3351% gamesnot enough data
Jimmy Warren + Charlie Rogers2437% gamesnot enough data
Craig Tumlin + David Weir4167% gamesnot enough data
Craig Tumlin + Michael Dobbs404 matchesnot enough data
Steve Hicks + Mark Camp044 matchesnot enough data
Craig Tumlin + Mark Camp123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Craig Tumlin
35W–19L career · 32 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.68
3.5
Brandall Wright
8W–5L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
David Weir
17W–12L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
David Leonard
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Jimmy Warren
25W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Charlie Rogers
21W–21L career · 12 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Billy Le
8W–16L career · 8 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.03
3
Alex Stennis
11W–16L career · 12 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
John J Moore
26W–15L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
LaMont Stokes
9W–9L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Camp
9W–28L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Dobbs
12W–21L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Hicks
5W–20L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Leonard
6W–8L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.