Teams

Fretz/Savelli-Djukanovich W3.0S

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

15 players · average NTRP 2.90 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-28vs DAC/Phillips-Shackelford W3.0SLost 02
L#2 DoublesAnne Bayerl / Tea Threatt vs Haley Thomas / Joli Shaw4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHelen Deng / Natalie Pavelek vs Corinne Weis / Glenda Fodge2-6, 1-6
2025-06-14vs Huffhines/Burns-Mulligan W3.0SLost 02
L#2 DoublesTricia Djukanovich / Beth Wyszynski vs Kathrina Earhart-Macalanda / Lauren Earhart-Macalanda3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAnne Bayerl vs Yinru Huang1-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Margrit Bazan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Donna Wolf
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.02
Gerilynn Sanders
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.02
Deana Hicks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.93
Cynthia Savelli
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.92
Grisel Diaz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.88
Jill Lange
published
2.80
Anna Meitzen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.80
Anne Bayerl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.78
Helen Deng
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.76
Tricia Djukanovich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Ipek Rudd
published
2.48
Beth Wyszynski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Natalie Pavelek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tea Threatt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gerilynn Sanders + Cynthia Savelli4851% games−3.4% vs expected
Gerilynn Sanders + Donna Wolf9257% gamesnot enough data
Deana Hicks + Donna Wolf4257% gamesnot enough data
Gerilynn Sanders + Margrit Bazan3254% gamesnot enough data
Deana Hicks + Cynthia Savelli4161% gamesnot enough data
Helen Deng + Beth Wyszynski134 matchesnot enough data
Gerilynn Sanders + Grisel Diaz224 matchesnot enough data
Ipek Rudd + Jill Lange314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margrit Bazan
31W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.14
Donna Wolf
34W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Gerilynn Sanders
48W–49L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Deana Hicks
20W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Cynthia Savelli
22W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Grisel Diaz
17W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Jill Lange
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
2.5
Anna Meitzen
19W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.80
3
Anne Bayerl
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Helen Deng
7W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.78
Tricia Djukanovich
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
Ipek Rudd
22W–26L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Beth Wyszynski
5W–16L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Natalie Pavelek
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tea Threatt
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.