Teams

Downing/18's/4.0/SC Day

2026 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Day

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings3 teams · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ethridge/18's/4.0/FAC Day62291130288
2LeDoux/18's/4.0/PAC Day62271332264
3Downing/18's/4.0/SC Day0843676466

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Cherie Pausina
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.65
Allyson Sanderson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Alysha Schroeder
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.19
Caroline France
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Jamie McWilliams
usually #1 Doubles 37%, also #2 Doubles 37% · published
Janel Gray
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kelly Slimming
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Kimberly Darr
usually #1 Doubles 37%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Leslie Marcello
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Melissa Biggs
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Pamela Schroeder
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 19% · published
Rhonda Simmons
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sally Dane Sperry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Stephanie Rolling
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Tracy Pourciau
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Vonda Downing
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Pourciau + Melissa Biggs3255% gamesnot enough data
Cherie Pausina + Stephanie Rolling4158% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Darr + Kelly Slimming134 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Biggs + Jamie McWilliams033 matchesnot enough data
Cherie Pausina + Leslie Marcello123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cherie Pausina
14W–18L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Allyson Sanderson
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.65
3.5
Alysha Schroeder
18W–15L career · type A · 28 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Caroline France
15W–13L career · 12 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Jamie McWilliams
29W–17L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Janel Gray
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kelly Slimming
43W–34L career · 33 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kimberly Darr
46W–26L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Leslie Marcello
3W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Biggs
15W–24L career · 30 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pamela Schroeder
7W–17L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rhonda Simmons
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sally Dane Sperry
2W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Rolling
23W–15L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tracy Pourciau
44W–26L career · 31 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vonda Downing
5W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.