Teams

LStrump (Palisades CC)

2023 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-04-12vs JLee (Colonel Beatty)Won 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Strump / Nataliya Rubanenko vs Brittany Marshall / Elisa Salim6-2, 6-1
2023-03-29vs LHuntington (Park Road)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Strump / Pamela Faile vs Joanne Lee / Claudia Prager6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2023-03-15vs MKelling/RJoplin (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Strump / Christina Chen vs Annie Shook-Maier / Palak Merchant3-6, 3-6
2023-03-08vs MMetzl (Sardis)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNataliya Rubanenko / Lisa Strump vs Sarah Asby / Martha Metzl2-6, 2-6
2023-03-01vs SChandra (Charlotte Indoor)Won 20
W#2 DoublesLISA KRUSE / Lisa Strump vs Jane Moncayo / Marjorie Wagner6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLisa Monty vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Debbie Wilson
published 3.5
3.28
Pamela Faile
published
3.13
Nataliya Rubanenko
published
3.08
Lisa Strump
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.06
Lisa Monty
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Stephanie Durovic
published
2.75
Dawn Houpt
published 3
2.69
Amy MacDonnell
published 3
2.61
Laura Hatfield
published
Laura Richter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nataliya Rubanenko + Lisa Strump7452% games+1.1% vs expected
Lisa Monty + Dawn Houpt7256% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Monty + Laura Hatfield303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Debbie Wilson
3W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
Pamela Faile
16W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Nataliya Rubanenko
35W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%18%82%
3.13
3
Lisa Strump
32W–36L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
3.08
3.5
Lisa Monty
40W–22L career · 1 line in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
Stephanie Durovic
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Dawn Houpt
31W–20L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Amy MacDonnell
8W–15L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
Laura Hatfield
22W–30L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.61
Laura Richter
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.