Teams

PDozier (Mountainbrook)

2026 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Thurs PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-07-30vs ANguyen (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesPatrick Blandford vs Andre Nguyen7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesParker Dozier vs Sai Venky Ganduri3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAdam Dyer vs Leonard Evansek0-6, 0-6
2026-07-30vs ABeaver/ARavid (Mason Wallace)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesParker Dozier vs Asaf Ravid2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesClaud Grigg vs Alec Beaver4-6, 2-6
2026-07-17vs WLewis (Alexander St Park)Won 30
W#1 SinglesParker Dozier vs Steven Auslander6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesPatrick Blandford vs Brandon Lucio6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesClaud Grigg vs David Maloney6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-07-02vs CBiedrzycki (Veterans Park)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesParker Dozier vs Kellan Mann0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesTaylor Dillon vs Kristopher Tremblay1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesClaud Grigg vs Chris Biedrzycki3-6, 3-6
2026-07-01vs SCalderalo (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesPatrick Blandford vs Will Karp4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAdam Dyer vs Dominic Ferraro1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesParker Dozier vs Larry Gao7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2026-06-25vs MKrasniewski/CJacobs (Park Road)Lost 01
L#3 SinglesClaud Grigg vs Timothy Whelan1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-06-11vs PSercer (Piper Glen)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesPatrick Blandford vs Eric Weinbrenner7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesClaud Grigg vs David Shevsky4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesTaylor Dillon vs Nicholas Munn6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesPaul Jakubicki vs Kyle Tomlin0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesParker Dozier vs Caleb Eiland1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesAdam Dyer vs Ian Morris1-6, 1-6
2026-06-01vs GEstrada (Park Road)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesPatrick Blandford vs Daniel Gonzalez6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesTaylor Dillon vs Rafael Balderrama0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesClaud Grigg vs Ivan Blakeney2-6, 3-6
2026-05-28vs MPaul (Jeff Adams)Won 21
W#1 SinglesParker Dozier vs Joseph Musante6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesTaylor Dillon vs Walter Wingard6-2, 6-3
L#3 SinglesAdam Dyer vs Robert Sproule0-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Patrick Blandford
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Parker Dozier
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.92
Adam Dyer
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.87
Claud Grigg
usually #3 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.74
Taylor Dillon
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
Paul Jakubicki
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Patrick Blandford
97W–75L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
Parker Dozier
4W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Adam Dyer
0W–8L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.92
3
Claud Grigg
3W–7L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
Taylor Dillon
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.74
Paul Jakubicki
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.