Teams

DCallinan/KGibson (Raintree)

2026 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.57 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule11 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 8 7:00 PM
vs
Tournament Players Club Piper Glen
Sep 10 8:00 PM
vs TLaBrosse/Nikrooz (Carmel)
Raintree Country Club
Sep 15 8:00 PM
vs
Raintree Country Club
Sep 17 6:30 PM
at LPorcher/LSatterly (Carmel)
Carmel Country Club
Sep 22 6:30 PM
Queens Sports Complex at Marion Diehl Park
Sep 24 7:00 PM
Donna CallinanKrista Gibson
Sep 29 8:00 PM
vs
Raintree Country Club
Oct 1 6:30 PM
vs
Raintree Country Club
Oct 6 7:00 PM
Jeff Adams Tennis Center
Oct 8 8:00 PM
vs
Weddington Swim and Racquet Club Inc
Oct 13 6:30 PM
Raintree Country Club
2026-09-01vs CCaudill/MHarding (PPRSC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesMary Anne Bullock / Anje Seufert vs Virginia Schmidt / Ashley Feehan6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarie LeSaint / Kirstin Martin vs Rachel Bardin / Erin Pavelchak6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKrista Gibson / Marie Foley vs Christina Murphy / Katie Sewell6-1, 6-0
2026-08-25vs TMacuga/Sweeney (Park Crossing)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Anne Bullock / Anna Leigh Marquez vs Danielle Hutcheson / Katlin Phillips1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Callinan / Krista Gibson vs Tish Macuga / Jessica Ramirez2-6, 0-6
2026-08-18vs SDeVries (PCC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesKrista Gibson / Margaret Miller vs Sara DeVries / Brooks Herman6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMary Anne Bullock / Katherine Reeves vs Melissa Pavlovich / Elizabeth Suppa7-6, 6-3
2026-08-04vs ACombs/RMaietta (BCC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMarie LeSaint / Anje Seufert vs Rachel Couchenour / Michelle Silla6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings22 teams · 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TMacuga/Sweeney (Park Crossing)3090118
2KDavis/ABroemel (Queens)2060236
3DCallinan/KGibson (Raintree)2051243
4KHudson (Piper Glen)1030017
5AKupchella/AJeter (OPRC)1021334
6IMcLeod (Carmel)1142549
7CSoliday (Jeff Adams)1133652
8GRhew (OPRC)1133760
9SLauer (Brookhaven)1124859
10KDowdy (Piper Glen)12451077
11JKeller (Firethorne)000000
12KKeen/LMadonna (WSRC)000000
13APessina (Carmel)000000
14DPollack/Kilduff (Sardis)000000
15BMalley (Longview)000000
16PRhame/GLiz (Park Road)000000
17YKwon (Life Time)000000
18CPrice (Charlotte Country Club)000000
19SDeVries (PCC)02151066
20ACombs/RMaietta (BCC)02151064
21AFilingeri (OPRC)02151070
22DBurns/SPoplin (Jeff Adams)02061274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.69
Krista Gibson
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.67
Marie LeSaint
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Lisa Carmichael
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.50
Donna Callinan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.45
Mary Anne Bullock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.44
Marie Foley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Anje Seufert
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.37
Katherine Reeves
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.35
Anna Leigh Marquez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.26
Lucinda Supernavage
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.23
Christina Hall
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Krista Gibson + Donna Callinan5254% games+10.7% vs expected
Lisa Carmichael + Donna Callinan4359% games+7.1% vs expected
Anje Seufert + Lucinda Supernavage134 matchesnot enough data
Donna Callinan + Lucinda Supernavage314 matchesnot enough data
Krista Gibson + Anna Leigh Marquez213 matchesnot enough data
Donna Callinan + Anna Leigh Marquez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Krista Gibson
27W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%8%92%
2.69
3
Marie LeSaint
32W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
2.67
2.5
Lisa Carmichael
37W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%39%61%
2.54
2.5
Donna Callinan
46W–78L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%50%50%
2.50
Mary Anne Bullock
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.45
Marie Foley
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%68%32%
2.44
2.5
Anje Seufert
11W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.39
Katherine Reeves
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.37
2.5
Anna Leigh Marquez
9W–18L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35
2.5
Lucinda Supernavage
35W–84L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.26
2.5
Christina Hall
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.