Teams

LEDMONDSON

2022 Cap Spring USTA 55 & over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-05vs PMabungaLost 01
L#3 DoublesLea Edmondson / Christy van Ness vs Krissy Caro / Terry Marcott6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2022-04-20vs LStradlingWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Wieber / Sarah Winstead vs Betsy Fulcher / Julia Hoke2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesYvette DeSilva / Anne Axberg vs Chrissie Bumgardner / Leanne Stradling7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTina Goertz / Christy van Ness vs Terri Haywood / Lu Ann Little6-4, 6-4
2022-04-11vs SChapmanLost 02
L#2 DoublesTina Goertz / Sarah Winstead vs Caroline Miller / Shelley Crisp4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPaula Anderson / Christy van Ness vs Carolyn Elliott / Susan Kruchten1-6, 0-6
2022-04-06vs KLamb/LLeachSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLaura Sullivan / Sarah Winstead vs Frauke Mirenda / Jo Ann Novak2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesChristy van Ness / Yvette DeSilva vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-18vs LStradlingLost 12
L#1 DoublesTina Goertz / Carolyn Wieber vs Betsy Fulcher / Terri Haywood4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristy van Ness / Paula Anderson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesYvette DeSilva / Beth Shelly vs Julia Hoke / Jan Copeland2-6, 3-6
2022-03-03vs SChapmanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSarah Winstead / Anne Axberg vs Rita Burgess / Alisa Miller2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesEllen Zimmerman / Carolyn Wieber vs Shelley Crisp / Perry LeGaux7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.50
Lea Edmondson
published
2.46
Sarah Winstead
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.41
Carolyn Wieber
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.40
Christy van Ness
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.35
Tina Goertz
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Yvette DeSilva
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Paula Anderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Wieber + Tina Goertz3553% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Winstead + Yvette DeSilva1637% gamesnot enough data
Christy van Ness + Tina Goertz2448% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Winstead + Carolyn Wieber033 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Wieber + Christy van Ness213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lea Edmondson
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
2.50
3
Sarah Winstead
41W–99L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
2.46
2.5
Carolyn Wieber
85W–108L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%75%25%
2.41
2.5
Christy van Ness
74W–119L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%79%21%
2.40
2.5
Tina Goertz
83W–199L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%87%13%
2.35
2.5
Yvette DeSilva
34W–55L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Paula Anderson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.