Teams

Coleman

2023 Shenandoah Singles Fall Weekday · Shenandoah 4.0 Weekday FALL Singles Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.17 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-25vs MiddleburgSplit 11
W#1 SinglesChristina Schinner vs Ashley la Shelle7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJacquelyn Worman vs Nicole Watson5-7, 1-6
2023-10-18vs MiddleburgWon 10
W#3 SinglesJenelle Langen vs Tara Wegdam6-2, 6-0
2023-10-11vs MiddleburgWon 21
W#1 SinglesChristina Schinner vs Nicole Watson6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJenelle Langen vs Stewart Herbert6-7, 1-6
W#3 SinglesJacquelyn Worman vs Tara Wegdam6-3, 6-3
2023-10-04vs MiddleburgWon 10
W#3 SinglesMoo Hackett vs Maria Eldredge6-2, 6-1
2023-09-27Won 10
W#3 SinglesChristina Schinner vs Julie Seraphin6-1, 6-1
2023-09-20vs MiddleburgLost 01
L#2 SinglesMoo Hackett vs Michelle Abalos4-6, 2-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah 4.0 Weekday FALL Singles Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Jessica Coleman
published
4.12
Dana Moss
published 4.5
3.90
Moo Hackett
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4.5
3.81
Allison Kearney
published 4
3.81
Christina Schinner
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.67
Jenelle Langen
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.65
Jacquelyn Worman
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.62
Melissa Carruthers
published
3.43
Jennifer Fox
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Coleman
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
4.13
4.5
Dana Moss
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Moo Hackett
91W–79L career · 2 lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
3.90
4
Allison Kearney
20W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Christina Schinner
227W–98L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Jenelle Langen
243W–115L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Jacquelyn Worman
137W–92L career · 2 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
Melissa Carruthers
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.62
Jennifer Fox
14W–24L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.