Teams

Palouse-Higgins

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 MEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-26vs CBRC-Smarter, Not Harder!Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Cattell / Danny Mullins vs Larry Floyd / Gordon Slysz3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMark Jackson / Alan Johnson vs Pane Stankovic / Derek Peacock5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTom Strobel / Daniel Higgins vs Adam Hrebeniuk / Nikolla Qafoku5-7, 2-6
2025-10-26vs EW-PFC-SatreLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Higgins / John Cattell vs Kevin Jones / Glen Satre4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDanny Mullins / Alan Johnson vs Craig Fager / John Williams2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKent Davis / Tom Strobel vs Carl Bruscoe / Guy Schneider1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-25vs EW-YTC-LozanoLost 12
W#1 DoublesDaniel Higgins / John Cattell vs Robert Schefter / Richard Lozano6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Jackson / Jorge Pacheco vs Jim Stewart / David Elofson3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKent Davis / Danny Mullins vs Wally Morrison / James Degrasse2-6, 3-6
2025-10-25vs EW-PFC-SatreLost 12
W#1 DoublesJorge Pacheco / Daniel Higgins vs Guy Schneider / Craig Fager6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlan Johnson / Danny Mullins vs Carl Bruscoe / Kevin Jones1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKent Davis / Tom Strobel vs John Williams / Glen Satre1-6, 1-6
2025-10-24vs EW-YTC-LozanoLost 03
L#1 DoublesKent Davis / Daniel Higgins vs Kevin Tweed / Doug Conboy2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMark Jackson / John Cattell vs Wally Morrison / Robert Schefter1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAlan Johnson / Tom Strobel vs Jim Stewart / David Elofson2-6, 3-6
2025-10-24vs CBRC-Smarter, Not Harder!Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Jackson / John Cattell vs Adam Hrebeniuk / Larry Floyd6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Higgins / Danny Mullins vs Pane Stankovic / Gordon Slysz1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAlan Johnson / Kent Davis vs John Sands / Derek Peacock2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
John Cattell
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.60
Mark Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.57
Daniel Higgins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.49
Alan Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.37
Danny Mullins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Jorge Pacheco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kent Davis
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Tom Strobel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Jackson + John Cattell4250% games−1.8% vs expected
Jorge Pacheco + Daniel Higgins314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
John Cattell
157W–68L career · 7 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
Mark Jackson
48W–35L career · 7 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Daniel Higgins
15W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Alan Johnson
17W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Danny Mullins
33W–53L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Jorge Pacheco
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kent Davis
7W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tom Strobel
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.