Teams

KY/LEX/Humbert/Owens

2024 USTA FALL LEAGUE 18 & Over · 4.0 WOMEN

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-12-13vs KY/LEX/Lykins/Overstreet 4.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesMadison Eaton / Megan Burr vs Hiroko Nakata / Nicole Norfleet6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMichelle Abou-Jaoude vs Allison Overstreet7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSarah Beth Waterman / Emma Newland vs Leah Lykins / Marvetta Overstreet6-0, 6-1
2024-12-08vs KY/LEX/ERNSTWon 30
W#1 DoublesMegan Burr / Erin Brester vs Lisa Deaton / Allyssa Kilanowski7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLeah Schrass vs Maria del Mar Landron6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Owens / Emily Pernice vs Angie Cobb / Sarah Hancock6-1, 6-3
2024-11-23vs KY/LEX/Hundley-Molina 18Won 21
W#1 DoublesLaurel Humbert / Sarah Beth Waterman vs Kylie Russ / Leslie Russ6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesEmma Newland vs Lee Ann Jung6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Owens / Erin Brester vs Billie Walters / Anne Faulconer5-7, 1-6
2024-11-14vs KY/LEX/Lykins/Overstreet 4.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Beth Waterman / Leah Schrass vs Lily Le / Cynthia Yeiser6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJennifer Gieselman vs Erin Stoffer6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Abou-Jaoude / Laurel Humbert vs Allison Overstreet / Marvetta Overstreet6-1, 6-1
2024-11-03vs KY/LEX/ERNSTWon 30
W#1 DoublesErin Brester / Jennifer Gieselman vs Meghan Simonsen / Sarah Stykes6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBrooke Bridges vs Amy Worthington Johnson6-1, 6-5
W#2 DoublesMadison Eaton / Megan Burr vs Betty Grey / Allyssa Kilanowski6-3, 6-1
2024-10-26vs KY/LEX/Hundley-Molina 18Lost 12
L#1 DoublesEmma Newland / Leah Schrass vs Kylie Russ / Leslie Russ1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Abou-Jaoude vs Laurie Larkin1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Beth Waterman / Emily Pernice vs Katerina Molina / Doris Senters6-4, 6-0
2024-10-16vs KY/LEX/Lykins/Overstreet 4.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesMadison Eaton / Megan Burr vs Ileana Contreras / Lily Le3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesBrooke Bridges vs Erin Stoffer6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSarah Beth Waterman / Pat Miller vs Allison Overstreet / Cynthia Yeiser6-2, 6-3
2024-10-06vs KY/LEX/Hundley-Molina 18Lost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Brester / Leah Schrass vs Kylie Russ / Leslie Russ5-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesEmma Newland vs Katerina Molina5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Owens / Pat Miller vs Julie Carlisle / Melinda McClain1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-10-02vs KY/LEX/ERNSTWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaurel Humbert / Madison Eaton vs Monica Mestanza / Amy Bain6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJennifer Gieselman vs Jennifer Ernst6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Owens / Emily Pernice vs Carlyn Moore / Tanya Johnson6-0, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Jennifer Gieselman
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.89
Brooke Bridges
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.88
Sarah Beth Waterman
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.78
Madison Eaton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.78
Leah Schrass
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.75
Laurel Humbert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Michelle Abou-Jaoude
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Erin Brester
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.34
Emily Pernice
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.29
Sarah Owens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Emma Newland
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Megan Burr
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Owens + Erin Brester134 matchesnot enough data
Madison Eaton + Megan Burr213 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Owens + Emily Pernice303 matchesnot enough data
Erin Brester + Jennifer Gieselman303 matchesnot enough data
Erin Brester + Laurel Humbert123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Gieselman
16W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Brooke Bridges
20W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.89
Sarah Beth Waterman
21W–5L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.88
Madison Eaton
13W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Leah Schrass
22W–9L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Laurel Humbert
21W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Michelle Abou-Jaoude
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
Erin Brester
19W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.41
Emily Pernice
29W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Sarah Owens
10W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
3.29
Emma Newland
3W–2L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Burr
9W–1L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.