← Teams

SHC-Monson

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Jon Monson
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.94
Marcus Kroloff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Chris Eddy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
—
Jason Crawford
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.70
Sam Bradshaw
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Matthew Trank
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.66
Pete Stirling
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Clark Cosart
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.38
Russ DeMoss
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2022-06-12Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesWilliam Anderson / Chris Eddy vs Donald Pettitt / Rick Wong7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMark Stephenson / Pete Stirling vs Patrick Brewer / Ken Avenoso6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRuss DeMoss / Jaap Sparrius vs John Barnes / Steve Scharfstein7-5, 6-4
2022-06-05Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMarcus Kroloff / Matthew Trank vs Brian McDonagh / Doug Post1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSam Bradshaw / Michael Chang vs Patrick Herbst / Robert Torch6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJon Monson / Mark Stephenson vs William Hergenhan / John Hall6-1, 6-4
2022-05-22Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJon Monson / Jason Crawford vs Min Lee / Bob Lehman4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWilliam Anderson / Chris Eddy vs Cristian Crisan / David Richardson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesClark Cosart / Jae Joon Kang vs John Christiaan / Jono Neher7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-15Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesPete Stirling / Jason Crawford vs Patrick Brewer / Ken Avenoso6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesSam Bradshaw vs Jonathan Eames6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesWilliam Anderson / Clark Cosart vs Donald Pettitt / Rick Wong6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesChris Eddy / Jon Monson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-08Won 3–0
W#1 SinglesSam Bradshaw vs Stephen Marsh6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJon Monson / Matthew Trank vs Matt Zhou / Neerav Shah6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRuss DeMoss / Jaap Sparrius vs Paritosh Saxena / Brady Berry6-3, 6-3
2022-05-07Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMarcus Kroloff / Matthew Trank vs Neville Mehta / Eric Peterson6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJon Monson vs Mark Tryon6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJae Joon Kang / Russ DeMoss vs Scott Reis / Masanori Hibino6-3, 7-5
2022-04-16Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMarcus Kroloff / Matthew Trank vs Anthony Valenzuela / Carlin Jackson6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRuss DeMoss / Jason Crawford vs John Auer / Kevin Oloughlin6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesChris Eddy / Michael Chang vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-10Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJon Monson / Matthew Trank vs Deepak Selvanathan / Neerav Shah7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPete Stirling / Jason Crawford vs Vimal Natarajan / Ajay Kumar Tippisetti7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesClark Cosart / William Anderson vs Mitchell Whitehurst / Paritosh Saxena6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Jon Monson
112W–41L career
2%98%0%
4.13
4
Marcus Kroloff
33W–11L career
0%86%14%
3.94
4
Chris Eddy
63W–53L career
6%91%4%
3.75
4
Jason Crawford
33W–25L career
not enough data
—
4
Sam Bradshaw
30W–19L career
4%96%0%
3.70
4
Matthew Trank
78W–63L career
3%97%0%
3.68
4
Pete Stirling
23W–16L career
7%93%0%
3.66
4
Clark Cosart
61W–38L career
51%49%0%
3.44
3.5
Russ DeMoss
84W–42L career · type A
0%97%3%
3.38

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.