Teams

CCV DeLacey

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-16vs Raintree FallinWon 10
W#1 SinglesKerry DeLacey vs Sara Manners6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-14vs Westwood HauseLost 01
L#1 DoublesKerry DeLacey / Donna Butler vs Lauren Jones / Abigail Dryden3-6, 0-6
2022-06-09Won 10
W#2 SinglesKerry DeLacey vs Christine Lemons6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-07vs ACAC CarmanLost 01
L#2 DoublesDonna Butler / Kerry DeLacey vs Jeanine Wisor / Liesl Delisio2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-06-06Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKerry DeLacey vs Janet Todd1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-06-06vs KRA HaukLost 01
L#2 SinglesKerry DeLacey vs Sara Winterhoff6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2022-05-31vs Kings Charter PurmasirWon 10
W#1 DoublesKerry DeLacey / Donna Butler vs Holly Miles / Kathy Denunzio6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Katherine Shiveley
published
3.84
Kerry DeLacey
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
Donna Butler
published 4
3.68
Laurel Wise
published
3.40
Laura West Hatcher
published
3.34
Stephanie Parker
published
3.33
Kristin Mullins
published
3.17
Shula Good
published
3.11
Jennifer Levy
published
Lauren Hepper
published
Robin Reifsnider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Parker + Kerry DeLacey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Shiveley
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
4.12
4
Kerry DeLacey
143W–100L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Donna Butler
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Laurel Wise
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Laura West Hatcher
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%21%
3.40
Stephanie Parker
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
90%10%<1%
3.34
Kristin Mullins
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Shula Good
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Anne Robertson Starke
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Jennifer Levy
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lauren Hepper
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robin Reifsnider
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.