Teams

SGV Noobies A-Cheng-San Marino High/SU12

2025 SoCal FALL Team Singles · SGV - Men 4.5

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 SinglesAlan Han vs Chris Lin6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesSebastian Koh vs Judah Momon6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesRand Lee vs Spinner Chingon Fok2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAlan Han vs Andre Law4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJordan Cheng vs Bill Petrocelli3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 SinglesSebastian Koh vs Alexander Ko1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEric Leong vs Spinner Chingon Fok4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJordan Cheng vs Leo Draper6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesWallace Lee vs Judah Momon6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-26vs SGV Grinders -Vo-La Habra/SU12Won 21
W#1 SinglesAlan Han vs Ryan Cox6-1, 7-5
L#2 SinglesEric Leong vs Pablo Primucci4-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesJordan Cheng vs Michael Pang4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJordan Cheng vs Brandon Chan2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJordan Fein vs Andre Law5-7, 6-7
L#3 SinglesWallace Lee vs Huan Xu4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesEric Leong vs Leo Draper6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesJordan Fein vs Judah Momon2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJordan Cheng vs Chris Lin6-3, 7-6
2025-10-05vs SGV Grinders -Vo-La Habra/SU12Lost 12
L#1 SinglesCuong Minh Tran vs Ky Vo7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJordan Fein vs Keith Vazquez6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesWallace Lee vs Hien Le3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJordan Fein vs Adrian Tay4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAlan Han vs Bill Petrocelli6-4, 6-4
L#3 SinglesRand Lee vs Raymond Thai3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cuong Minh Tran
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Eric Leong
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
Alan Han
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.06
Sebastian Koh
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.79
Wallace Lee
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.60
Rand Lee
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Jordan Cheng
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Jordan Fein
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sebastian Koh + Alan Han033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cuong Minh Tran
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Eric Leong
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Alan Han
21W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.17
Sebastian Koh
18W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
4.06
Wallace Lee
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.79
Rand Lee
2W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.60
Jordan Cheng
8W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jordan Fein
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.