Teams

CSU GREEN

2024 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - NOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-20vs LVTA REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristina Welch / Wendy Clark vs Debra Netzel / Jeannette Popp5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Beach / Alison Earnhart vs Jennifer Schafer / Wendy Thomas4-6, 4-6
2024-06-13vs HMTC PURPLEWon 20
W#2 DoublesChristine Houldsworth / Eileen Heath vs Colleen Muhlbradt / Trish Lebsack5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Beach / Alison Earnhart vs Becky Olson / Linda Miller6-2, 6-3
2024-06-06vs MLF YELLOWLost 01
L#1 DoublesWendy Schaffer / Christina Welch vs Carrie Galyardt / Rachel Levalley6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-05-23vs HMTC PURPLEWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristina Welch / Wendy Schaffer vs Helen Crews / Carolina Moore1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEileen Heath / Christine Houldsworth vs Becky Olson / Helen Dungan6-3, 6-3
2024-05-16vs MLF YELLOWSplit 11
L#2 DoublesChristine Houldsworth / Christina Welch vs Jaime Donnelly / Kristin Schams1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTonya Motley / Alison Earnhart vs Rachel Levalley / Camy Davis6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Christina Welch
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Christine Houldsworth
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Alison Earnhart
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Jill Hartman
published
3.57
Wendy Schaffer
published
3.49
Karen Beach
published
3.49
Eileen Heath
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.21
Melinda Blatt
published
Tonya Motley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Welch + Christine Houldsworth4355% games−0.2% vs expected
Eileen Heath + Christine Houldsworth211950% games−1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Welch
35W–25L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.83
4
Christine Houldsworth
48W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Alison Earnhart
71W–48L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Jill Hartman
19W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.68
Wendy Schaffer
13W–19L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
Karen Beach
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.49
4
Eileen Heath
35W–57L career · 2 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
Melinda Blatt
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Tonya Motley
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.