Teams

CPeterson-HVCC

2026 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-15vs JRanheim-TOCHLost 01
L#1 SinglesBarbara Wilhelm vs Caroline Sloan1-6, 4-6
2026-06-30vs MMacdonald-HSWon 21
L#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Shira Katsir1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesBetsy Euler vs Mary Macdonald7-5, 6-2
W#3 SinglesBarbara Wilhelm vs Tynita Edwards6-2, 6-1
2026-06-25vs CMurray-HRSplit 11
W#2 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Michelle Koeneke6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesElizabeth Everett vs Susan Kim6-7, 4-6
2026-06-11vs LGilchrist-CHCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Laurie Rechholtz6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDeborah Hertzog vs Melissa Israel6-4, 7-6
L#3 SinglesElizabeth Everett vs Linda Gilchrist6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-04vs MFulton-UNCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesBarbara Wilhelm vs Laura Dean1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Sara Knechtel6-2, 6-0
2026-06-03vs SBartle-DURWon 21
W#1 SinglesLauren Powell vs Shannon Bartle6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Carin von Kahr6-3, 6-3
L#3 SinglesKensy Ryan vs Susanne Schmal3-6, 5-7
2026-05-28vs MLong-DURLost 01
L#2 SinglesBarbara Wilhelm vs Susan Brogden4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-05-18Lost 01
L#2 SinglesBarbara Wilhelm vs Diane Allen4-6, 2-6
2026-05-14vs DOrdronneau-TOCHWon 20
W#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Jennifer Magee6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesBarbara Wilhelm vs Laurie Birdsong6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Barbara Wilhelm
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
3.08
Betsy Euler
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
3.05
Cecily Peterson
usually #2 Singles 46%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3
3.03
Deborah Hertzog
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.97
Lauren Powell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.66
Elizabeth Everett
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.59
Kensy Ryan
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Hertzog + Barbara Wilhelm5355% games−8.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Barbara Wilhelm
47W–30L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
3
Betsy Euler
139W–108L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
Cecily Peterson
207W–207L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Deborah Hertzog
24W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
Lauren Powell
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Elizabeth Everett
8W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Kensy Ryan
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.