Teams

Corpus-Fence Hitters

2025 18 & Over Little State · Men's 3.0 Flight

8 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-17vs Corpus-Tennis QuaidWon 21
L#1 DoublesPaul Hernandez / Mark Tapia vs Tyler Cerecero / Chase Pfaff1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMatthew Zamora / RAVI RAJ vs Daniel Carlisle / David Stewart6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJoe Puente / Roy Gonzalez vs David Lopez / Timothy Carter7-6, 6-4
2025-08-17vs Austin-Net WarriorsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Tapia / Jinlong Wang vs Robert Paterson / Henry Fulton6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRAVI RAJ / Roy Gonzalez vs Richard Avalos / Jim Schubert6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPaul Hernandez / Jonathan Martinez vs Kenneth Dalton / Nicholas Scotch6-1, 6-4
2025-08-16vs Austin-Net WarriorsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoe Puente / Roy Gonzalez vs Nicholas Scotch / Henry Fulton6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRAVI RAJ / Mark Tapia vs Jim Schubert / Richard Avalos6-0, 6-1
2025-08-15vs Corpus-Tennis QuaidWon 21
L#1 DoublesJoe Puente / Jinlong Wang vs Chase Pfaff / Jesse Ibarra3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMatthew Roberts / Mark Tapia vs David Stewart / Preston Ley6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJonathan Martinez / Matthew Zamora vs David Lopez / Daniel Carlisle6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.0 Flight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Ryan Read
published
3.12
RAVI RAJ
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Mark Tapia
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Matthew Zamora
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Joe Puente
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Jinlong Wang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Paul Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Roy Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joe Puente + Roy Gonzalez5349% games−2.5% vs expected
RAVI RAJ + Mark Tapia303 matchesnot enough data
Mark Tapia + Paul Hernandez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Read
14W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.15
RAVI RAJ
11W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.12
Mark Tapia
31W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
Matthew Zamora
29W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
Joe Puente
19W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Jinlong Wang
29W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Paul Hernandez
11W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.85
Roy Gonzalez
26W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.