Teams

Fee - Luer

2023 Brevard Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.80 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-05vs EFSC - TaylorWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Conway / Renee Jiannine vs Susan Wilkes / Lisa Shaffer6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Stephanie Tran vs Trisha Watson / Kate Kimball6-1, 6-3
2023-05-31vs EGYC - LoveSplit 11
W#2 DoublesErin Conway / Renee Jiannine vs Leslie Love / SARAH KILLION6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Anne Burns vs Kalpana Gadodia / Marsha Lindfelt2-6, 4-6
2023-05-15vs Brevard/Leiter/18&Over3.0WLost 02
L#1 SinglesKatharyn Luer vs Mary Failla2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRenee Jiannine / Erin Conway vs Bonita Madden / Bev Wilcocks3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-05-01vs Rockledge - KubeLost 02
L#1 DoublesRenee Jiannine / Monika DeMari vs Lori Abbott / Lyuda Saks3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Daricca Facciobene vs Mary Jo Pecoraro / Melissa Meikle2-6, 1-6
2023-04-24vs Suntree - HonakerWon 20
W#1 SinglesRenee Jiannine vs Karyn Honaker6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Daricca Facciobene vs Frances Halley / Kristina Braid6-2, 7-5
2023-04-17vs RCCB - CordisWon 10
W#2 DoublesRenee Jiannine / Erin Conway vs MARIE MEASEL-HUGHES / Susan Ford6-0, 6-0
2023-04-10vs Kiwi - SalvatoreWon 20
W#1 SinglesRenee Jiannine vs Brittany Reiter6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Debra Grayson vs Claire Kubilins / Rebecca Stevens6-2, 6-4
2023-04-03vs Suntree - FordSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMonika DeMari / Renee Jiannine vs Sharon Ford / Caroline Jiborn6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKatharyn Luer vs SARA BRESETTE4-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Stephanie Tran
published
2.93
Renee Jiannine
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.91
Katharyn Luer
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.58
Erin Conway
published
2.18
Anne Burns
published 2.5
1.93
Debra Grayson
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katharyn Luer + Renee Jiannine13659% games+11.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Tran
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.55
3
Renee Jiannine
104W–89L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Katharyn Luer
158W–172L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Daricca Facciobene
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Erin Conway
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
2.58
2.5
Anne Burns
9W–18L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Debra Grayson
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.