MAG Green 6.5
2026 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 6.5
8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / VIRGINIA
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Flight standings26 teams · Richmond Combo Mixed 6.5
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Westwood West | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2Dominion Dykes Mixed 6.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3MAC Church Mixed 6.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4WW Pokeyberg - Combs-Pokrywka | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5Avalon Luchsinger Mixed Misfits | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6Raintree Retrievers - Cheek | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7ACAC Ralstown Combo Mixed - Townsend | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8Raintree Begin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9Woodlake Phelps 6.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10ACAC Lewis / Pfeiffer 6.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11Avalon Ghita 6.5 Combo Mix | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12ACAC Naputi - Berg 6.5 CM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13Dominion Club Long | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14Burkwood Sweeney 6.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15ACAC Mixed up Jonesie 6.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16MAC Mavericks Bates | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17Belmont sherdel styer | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18SCC McClenny 6.5 Combo Mixed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19MAC Talamo 6.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20CCV 6.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21MAG Green 6.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22Bon Air 6.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23KRA Ball Smashers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24MRTC Hawley 6.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25Willow Oaks McFadden | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26Willow Oaks Gregory | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.