Teams

FV:Volley Girls:Cheney/

2025 NCT Summer Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.0 Adult Women 1

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-17vs FV:Up Your Alley:Ostrov/TangWon 40
W#1 DoublesShubha Jaishankar / Heather Nickerson vs XIA TANG / Sandra Borjas6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDeepta Ramesh vs Laura Whittemore6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrittany Tubbs / Mika Inoue vs Jill Scarfo / Janice Testerman6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAllison Cheney / Dena Przybyl vs Laurie Fede / Catherine Jahne6-0, 6-2
2025-07-16vs MLM:Supreme Court:Snuffer/FundockWon 30
W#1 DoublesShubha Jaishankar / Danielle Sinder vs Camryn Kessler / Joan Guerrera6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDena Przybyl vs Jen Ludgin6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDeepta Ramesh / Brittany Tubbs vs Sharon Snuffer / Rebecca Wetzel6-1, 6-1
2025-07-14vs FV:Your First Serve:Nassar/AnthonySplit 22
L#1 DoublesAllison Cheney / Kelly McGeever vs Michele Wolff / Emily Galati2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesShubha Jaishankar vs Elizabeth Diamond3-6, 5-4
W#2 DoublesDanielle Sinder / Heather Nickerson vs Stephanie Dominello / Taylor Radke7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMargaret Rakas / Dena Przybyl vs Suzanne Watson / Christina Thavenius2-6, 1-6
2025-07-07vs FV:Serve & Slay:Tomlinson/LittleWon 31
L#1 DoublesDeepta Ramesh / Heather Nickerson vs Haley Krafft / Rachel Bowe2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesShubha Jaishankar vs Devon Hart6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDanielle Sinder / Maree Jaramillo vs Brandy Little / Christina Lu6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDena Przybyl / Allison Cheney vs Heather Tomlinson / Melodi Kinsella6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesDeepta Ramesh / Danielle Sinder vs Karen LaBranche / Yuemei Zhang2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesShubha Jaishankar vs Linda Casey6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMika Inoue / Allison Cheney vs Kate Cocuzzo / Erin Leavitt-Smith3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHeather Nickerson / Margaret Rakas vs Sarah Mancini / Chiara Santavenere6-4, 6-1
2025-06-23vs BTC:Summer Slice Girls:Farber/HarrisSplit 22
W#1 DoublesShubha Jaishankar / Kelly McGeever vs Amy Pascal / Sophia Walters4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrittany Tubbs vs Natalie Kirkpatrick3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMargaret Rakas / Mika Inoue vs Sandrine Sebag / Adrienne Roach7-6, 4-2
L#3 DoublesDena Przybyl / Maree Jaramillo vs Joslyn Cruz / Devi Mathur2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesAllison Cheney / Margaret Rakas vs Erica LuBonta Bontatibus / Anna Seymour3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesDena Przybyl vs Elizabeth Foster6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHeather Nickerson / Elaine Grocott vs Kristen Renehan / Elizabeth Hennessy4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesDanielle Sinder / Deepta Ramesh vs Morgan Castrogiovanni / Kathryn Spencer6-2, 7-5
2025-06-10vs GTC:Summer 10S:Zurcher/ShieldsWon 40
W#1 DoublesKelly McGeever / Deepta Ramesh vs Beverly Seymour / Maria Alderborg Milne6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesShubha Jaishankar vs Ingrid MacLean7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesElaine Grocott / Mika Inoue vs Wendy Dempsey / Karen Zurcher6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBrittany Tubbs / Maree Jaramillo vs Kirsten Hazard / Loni Figura6-2, 6-0
L#1 DoublesElaine Grocott / Margaret Rakas vs Courtney Feingold / Kristen Horrigan0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAllison Cheney vs Kristina Schumann4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Nickerson / Shubha Jaishankar vs Christine Peterson / Amy Steinberg7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDeepta Ramesh / Kelly McGeever vs Meri Lee Tyler / Audrey Boskiewicz7-5, 6-4
W#1 DoublesShubha Jaishankar / Heather Nickerson vs Melissa Bender / Cheryl Benjamin6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKelly McGeever vs Amanda Savath5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMaree Jaramillo / Danielle Sinder vs Amy Kruse / Beth Llewelyn6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrittany Tubbs / Mika Inoue vs Alla Manni / Leah la Tour6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.0 Adult Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FV:Your First Serve:Nassar/Anthony01031718244
2FV:Volley Girls:Cheney/010271228309
3FV:Serve & Slay:Tomlinson/Little010251230313
4RFL:Summer Honey Deuces:Schumann/Cirelli010241434314
5BTC:Summer Slice Girls:Farber/Harris010201536315
6FV:Summer Angels:Castrogiovanni/Tcherni-Buzzeo010172145354
7GTC:Summer 10S:Zurcher/Shields010162145380
8FV:Hot Summer Slice:Olivieri/Rutledge01092963433

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Mika Inoue
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.06
Elaine Grocott
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Brittany Tubbs
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.93
Kelly McGeever
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.90
Danielle Sinder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Deepta Ramesh
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.87
Maree Jaramillo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Allison Cheney
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Margaret Rakas
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.82
Shubha Jaishankar
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
2.80
Heather Nickerson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.80
Dena Przybyl
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Rakas + Mika Inoue9173% games+13.3% vs expected
Danielle Sinder + Kelly McGeever4260% games+10.9% vs expected
Allison Cheney + Margaret Rakas11358% games+8.6% vs expected
Danielle Sinder + Maree Jaramillo4162% games+8.6% vs expected
Maree Jaramillo + Brittany Tubbs6359% games+4.3% vs expected
Elaine Grocott + Mika Inoue404 matchesnot enough data
Elaine Grocott + Margaret Rakas213 matchesnot enough data
Allison Cheney + Mika Inoue213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mika Inoue
82W–59L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.12
Elaine Grocott
98W–47L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Brittany Tubbs
23W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Kelly McGeever
19W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Danielle Sinder
17W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Deepta Ramesh
18W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Maree Jaramillo
15W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Allison Cheney
52W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
Margaret Rakas
64W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
Shubha Jaishankar
20W–8L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Heather Nickerson
11W–4L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Dena Przybyl
19W–42L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.