Teams

O'Connor-Crenshaw

2025 40 & Over Southern Combo Doubles - Night-Montgomery · 8.5 Combo Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-21vs MCC CONEWon 20
W#1 DoublesNghia Nguyen / Stephen Nettelhorst vs Mark Caradori / Greg Alford2-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Crenshaw / Jarred Kaplan vs Keith Wilson / Lance Covert6-1, 6-3
2025-08-07vs MCC CONELost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Crenshaw / Bobby Trott vs Stephen Nettelhorst / Edwin Hampton3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNghia Nguyen / Keith Wilson vs Harrison Campbell / James Armstrong6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLance Covert / Sukno Park vs Jarred Kaplan / Greg Alford2-6, 2-6
2025-07-17vs MCC CONELost 02
L#1 DoublesSukno Park / Stephen Nettelhorst vs Harrison Campbell / Greg Alford2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTodd Henderson / Lance Covert vs James Armstrong / Bobby Trott5-7, 1-6
2025-07-10vs MCC CONELost 12
L#1 DoublesSukno Park / Keith Wilson vs Jarred Kaplan / Mariano Runco0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Crenshaw / Brian Cone vs Todd Henderson / Edwin Hampton2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLance Covert / Andrew Ford vs Greg Alford / James Armstrong0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Combo Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
John Crenshaw
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.05
Stephen Nettelhorst
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Edwin Hampton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Keith Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Todd Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Lance Covert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.53
Kenny Sands
published
3.35
Sukno Park
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Andrew Ford
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sukno Park + Lance Covert0527% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Crenshaw
12W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.12
4
Stephen Nettelhorst
146W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
4.05
Edwin Hampton
21W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
Keith Wilson
15W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
Todd Henderson
29W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.59
Lance Covert
8W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Kenny Sands
5W–34L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Sukno Park
7W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.35
3
Andrew Ford
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.