Teams

Kumar/Nashville

2025 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 4.0 Women - Monday AM

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Jennifer Kistner
published
3.60
Melissa von Wald
published
3.47
Maria Schoonover
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.40
Lauren Wideman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.39
Mary Fetherling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Nina Kumar
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.33
Susan Manley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Leena Choi
published
3.32
Maryam Khan
published
3.31
Tammy Shrivalle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Marian Vangeli
published
3.28
Carly Lawrence
published 3.5
3.28
Patricia Frawley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Clarissa Green
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Michelle Deng
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Stephanie Buhalis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Jennifer Roh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Lesly Todesco
published
3.06
Kerri Frye
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Wideman + Nina Kumar11653% games+4.8% vs expected
Mary Fetherling + Jennifer Roh4160% games+1.1% vs expected
Tammy Shrivalle + Marian Vangeli2448% games−0.2% vs expected
Marian Vangeli + Susan Manley4945% games−4.7% vs expected
Lesly Todesco + Susan Manley1636% games−8.1% vs expected
Tammy Shrivalle + Susan Manley2348% gamesnot enough data
Marian Vangeli + Lesly Todesco0539% gamesnot enough data
Tammy Shrivalle + Patricia Frawley224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Kistner
1W–13L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Melissa von Wald
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
Maria Schoonover
21W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Lauren Wideman
27W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Mary Fetherling
20W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Nina Kumar
36W–40L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Susan Manley
26W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Leena Choi
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Maryam Khan
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Tammy Shrivalle
43W–59L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Marian Vangeli
19W–30L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.30
3.5
Carly Lawrence
9W–17L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Patricia Frawley
41W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Clarissa Green
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Deng
12W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
Stephanie Buhalis
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Jennifer Roh
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Lesly Todesco
11W–27L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Kerri Frye
8W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.