Teams

SDNC LLW 3.0 WD Santaluz Club/ Vandling

2024 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC WD · SDNC - Women - 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 SinglesKristen Howell vs Giovanna Reinking6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesChristina MacIer vs Jenna Bavli3-6, 0-6
2024-05-21Won 10
W#1 SinglesKristen Howell vs Boni Buscemi6-0, 6-0
2024-05-14vs SDNC 3.0 FRCC (3:2)/ StromLost 01
L#1 SinglesKristen Howell vs Nichole Dolinsky6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMarisa Reinoso vs Brianne MacEachran4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesKristen Howell vs Julie Parker6-0, 6-3
2024-04-30Won 20
W#1 SinglesKristen Howell vs Judy Song6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesChristina MacIer vs Rose McGuire6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Li / Marisa Reinoso vs Jan Hegstad / Marni Miller6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChristina MacIer / Kristen Howell vs Vinita Roy / Elizabeth Prag6-2, 6-4
2024-04-16vs SDNC 3.0 RSFTC (3:2)/ RuzichWon 20
W#1 SinglesKristen Howell vs Rachael Thompson6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMarisa Reinoso vs Cynthia Hudson6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMarisa Reinoso vs Amanda Albert3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKristen Howell vs Lorena Maquera6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Kristen Howell
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Rachel Wagner
published
3.24
Christina MacIer
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Karen Leininger
published
3.18
Dawn Reichert
published 3.5
3.14
Marisa Reinoso
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Marla Vandling
published
3.00
Jennifer Alden
published
2.73
Amy Poling
published 3
2.67
Elizabeth Li
published
Sandra Uribe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina MacIer + Kristen Howell14854% games+0.4% vs expected
Rachel Wagner + Kristen Howell7156% games−1.9% vs expected
Marla Vandling + Karen Leininger3553% games−6.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kristen Howell
66W–34L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50
Rachel Wagner
17W–11L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Christina MacIer
68W–40L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Karen Leininger
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Dawn Reichert
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Marisa Reinoso
39W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Marla Vandling
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.10
Jennifer Alden
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Amy Poling
6W–14L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Elizabeth Li
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.67
Sandra Uribe
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.