Teams

Hutson

2022 FW Tri-Level · Womens 3.0-3.5-4.0 (lower)

13 players · average NTRP 3.70 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-11-13vs HendersonLost 01
L#3 DoublesTerri Wren / Susan May vs Karen Maggi / Lynn Carlson4-6, 5-7
2022-11-12vs RogersWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusan May / Terri Wren vs Dorothy McMillan / Tiffany Rogers6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 3.0-3.5-4.0 (lower) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Kimberly Grogan
published
3.81
Grace Sherouse
published 4
Alisha Wieland
published 4
3.63
Lupe Cocita
published
3.58
Amber Hutson
published 4
3.54
Trava Smith
published
3.45
Julie McGuire
published
3.35
Heidi Weaver
published 3.5
3.34
Karon Adams
published
3.29
Terri Wren
published
3.04
Lynn Rasmussen
published
2.96
Susan May
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Cindy Aldrete
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Grogan
62W–50L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Grace Sherouse
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Alisha Wieland
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lupe Cocita
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%17%83%
3.63
4
Amber Hutson
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
Trava Smith
30W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%38%62%
3.54
Julie McGuire
39W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Heidi Weaver
20W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Karon Adams
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Terri Wren
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Lynn Rasmussen
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
Susan May
38W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Cindy Aldrete
29W–33L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.