Teams

MATA/Kimberly Faulkner

2025 MATA Southern Combo 18 & Over - Summer · 7.5 Women TUESDAY PM

16 players · average NTRP 3.83 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-10vs RN-ClaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesMonica Windham / Haley Yarbrough vs Frances Clay / Kim Carter6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMolly Sexton / Aimee Dasher vs Cindy Arena / Lisa McLendon4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-07-31vs HOCO-LudickeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristina Lovett / Molly Sexton vs Traci Ludicke / Vanessa Brooks1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCaroline Childs / Becca McLeod vs Shakeela Jackson / Jennifer Grady6-0, 6-3
2025-07-14vs RN-ClaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesMolly Sexton / Caroline Smith vs Teresa Moody / Starla Pellegrino7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesStacy Wilson / Mary Beth Hand vs Cindy Arena / Kim Carter2-6, 0-3
2025-07-01vs HOCO-LudickeLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnna Blanche Pennington / Haley Yarbrough vs Angie Schwendeman / Jennifer Grady7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMiriam Smith / Becca McLeod vs Luann Causey / Angela Easom7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJan Slocumb / Elizabeth Hardy vs Leslie Elliott / Joann Sanchez6-7, 3-6
2025-06-26vs RN-ClayWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Hardy / Anna Blanche Pennington vs Julie Redick / Cindy Arena7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMonica Windham / Jan Slocumb vs Frances Clay / Teresa Moody6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChristina Lovett / Caroline Smith vs Kim Carter / Tamara Banks5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2025-06-10vs HOCO-LudickeWon 30
W#1 DoublesTarver Perry / Kristen Prosperi vs Patsy Bendall / Joann Sanchez6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKimberly Faulkner / Lisa Fussell vs Kim Joiner / Julie Reynolds6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesHolly Taylor / Meredith Covert vs Leslie Elliott / Traci Ludicke6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.5 Women TUESDAY PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MATA/Kimberly Faulkner5112613133
2HOCO-Ludicke429920173
3RN-Clay0651327185

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Becca McLeod
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Haley Yarbrough
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Anna Blanche Pennington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Kimberly Faulkner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Monica Windham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Meredith Covert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Kristen Prosperi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Caroline Childs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Molly Sexton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.52
Tarver Perry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Jan Slocumb
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Miriam Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Lisa Fussell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Christina Lovett
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Aimee Dasher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Mary Beth Hand
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meredith Covert + Miriam Smith5162% games+13.4% vs expected
Meredith Covert + Caroline Childs8157% games+4.3% vs expected
Anna Blanche Pennington + Haley Yarbrough5255% games−2.5% vs expected
Jan Slocumb + Aimee Dasher2446% games−5.0% vs expected
Kimberly Faulkner + Miriam Smith404 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Prosperi + Tarver Perry134 matchesnot enough data
Molly Sexton + Aimee Dasher224 matchesnot enough data
Meredith Covert + Becca McLeod404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Becca McLeod
38W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Haley Yarbrough
39W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.89
4
Anna Blanche Pennington
31W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Kimberly Faulkner
19W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
3.72
Monica Windham
28W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Meredith Covert
42W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
3.69
Kristen Prosperi
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Caroline Childs
27W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67
Molly Sexton
47W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.59
Tarver Perry
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Jan Slocumb
48W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
Miriam Smith
22W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.38
Lisa Fussell
11W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Christina Lovett
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Aimee Dasher
30W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Mary Beth Hand
17W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.