Teams

Curfman/Gleason/Wernet

2025 ONE Doubles SPRING · 3.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Wernet / Amy Gleason vs Sarah Smith / Megan Johnson6-2, 6-2
2025-04-22vs MillerLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Gleason / Sarah Curfman vs Courtney Miller / Jena Cogswell7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-04-08vs Jacoby/HoveWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Gleason / Katie Wernet vs Amy Hove / Stacy Ludwig6-4, 7-5
2025-03-25vs Cottew/GelharWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Wernet / Sarah Curfman vs Keela Cottew / Megan Gelhar6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Sarah Curfman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Amy Gleason
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Katie Wernet
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Curfman + Katie Wernet5649% games−1.0% vs expected
Amy Gleason + Katie Wernet224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Curfman
58W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Amy Gleason
28W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.44
Katie Wernet
13W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.