Teams

Cambier - Gust

2024 Collier Adult 40 & Over Spring · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.81 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-14Split 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Gust / Kara Demetris vs Ann Garvey / Cheryl Solimine3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDebbie Moses vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-07vs Naples Reserve - HugginsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesDebbie Moses vs Lynne Huggins2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Gust / Amber Hill vs Ramsay Erickson / Donna Digeronimo6-2, 7-6
2024-05-02Lost 02
L#1 SinglesDebbie Moses vs Chrissy Rogers3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Purvis / Diana DeFulviis vs Tammy Finlinson / Amy Gardner0-6, 3-6
2024-04-30vs Olde Cypress - NavarroLost 02
L#1 SinglesDebbie Moses vs Angela Whinyates1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Gust / Cathy Purvis vs Lori Coates / Minde Shinnick5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesCathy Purvis / Susan Wandler vs Robin Inscho / KAREN MAJERCZAK1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesDebbie Moses vs Cheryl Ingram6-4, 6-2
2024-04-09Won 10
W#1 SinglesDebbie Moses vs Beth Rainey7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2024-04-02vs Naples Reserve - HugginsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDebbie Moses vs Susan Burgess6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Gust / Cathy Purvis vs Amanda Mallette / Megan MacKrory3-6, 2-6
2024-03-26vs Olde Cypress - NavarroWon 10
W#2 DoublesCathy Purvis / Beth Solomon vs Minde Shinnick / Lori Coates3-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Kara Demetris
published
3.90
Cathy Purvis
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.75
Lisa Gust
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Debbie Moses
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.68
Lisa Vivori
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.54
Amber Hill
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.30
Diana DeFulviis
published 3.5
3.29
Allison Baker
published 3.5
3.26
Carol White
published 3.5
3.17
Sonja May
published
Lydia Jackson
published
Sheila MacNicol
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kara Demetris
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Cathy Purvis
59W–47L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
3.90
4
Lisa Gust
32W–52L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Debbie Moses
34W–42L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Lisa Vivori
82W–122L career · 4 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Amber Hill
79W–160L career · 7 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.54
3.5
Diana DeFulviis
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Allison Baker
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Carol White
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
Sonja May
29W–34L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Lydia Jackson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sheila MacNicol
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.