Teams

SDNC 4.0 Wildcats @RSFTC/ Nakamura

2023 SoCal Fall Doubles- SDNC- WD (Holiday) · SDNC - Women 4.0 Tues

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesKatherine Nakamura / Candace Stuart vs Lisa Farrar / Daryl Nann6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDiane Leffler / Tricia Bothmer vs Cheryell Woodworth / Stephanie Yasukochi4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Hobert / Diane Leffler vs Carey Cimino / Beth Munce3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMinerva Walz / Katherine Nakamura vs Carol Jensen / Haruko Vajda6-3, 6-2
L#1 DoublesAmy Hobert / Katherine Nakamura vs Olivia Sebastian / Martina Masarani5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDiane Leffler / Tricia Bothmer vs CHARLOTTE DEHESA / Julie Lessley7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDiana Knickrehm / Katherine Nakamura vs Deborah Fitzgerald / Miho Nakajima5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 DoublesStephanie Smith / Katherine Nakamura vs Rebecca Fletcher / Lynne Nero6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesTricia Bothmer / Diane Leffler vs Debby Totoritis / Christy Monko7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDiana Knickrehm / Minerva Walz vs Kathy Colarusso / Michele Chocholek6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKatherine Nakamura / Jennifer Rich vs Jennifer Bjornstad / Jennifer Vanderhyden3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women 4.0 Tues have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Katherine Nakamura
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.54
Diane Leffler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.39
Minerva Walz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Courtney LeBeau
published 3.5
3.22
Krista Young
published
3.17
Molly Tanner
published
3.01
Tricia Bothmer
published
LJ Nicholas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Minerva Walz + Katherine Nakamura8257% gamesnot enough data
Krista Young + Molly Tanner3250% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Katherine Nakamura
40W–29L career · 6 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Diane Leffler
51W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Minerva Walz
55W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Courtney LeBeau
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Krista Young
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
Molly Tanner
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
Tricia Bothmer
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
LJ Nicholas
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.