Teams

Ca.Garrett40C

2023 Cap Combo 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-30vs Ca.Langlois40CLost 01
L#2 DoublesSheffield Kropp / Shauna Alexander vs Marilyn Gordian / Catherine Langlois3-6, 4-6
2023-09-24vs Ja.Bossert40CWon 10
W#3 DoublesKimberly Eccles / Amanda Zukowski vs Rachel Bonistalli / Jane Bossert6-1, 6-0
2023-09-16vs Me.Proctor40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesCara Garrett / Beth Pegram vs Beth Farrell / Melissa Proctor6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-09-12vs Er.Oliver40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesBeth Pegram / Sara Fitzpatrick vs Nina Schweitzer / Karen Bornhofen3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-08-26vs Je.Komes40C2.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Edgerton / Beth Pegram vs Lanier McRee / Nancy Walters6-4, 6-3
2023-08-12vs Ka.Wahle40CSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKimberly Eccles / Sheffield Kropp vs Amanda Meyer / Julendia Gaillard5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesErin Bailey / Amanda Zukowski vs Ann Flores / Lacey Seaton7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2023-08-05vs Sa.Highsmith40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesCara Garrett / Sheffield Kropp vs Merrit Lumsden / Kristen Patch2-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Beth Pegram
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.67
Sara Fitzpatrick
published
2.55
Laura Edgerton
published
2.54
Cara Garrett
published 3
2.51
Shannon Vinson
published
2.51
Amanda Zukowski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.40
Shauna Alexander
published
2.29
Leah Beatty
published
2.12
Sheffield Kropp
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Laurie Yopp
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Beth Pegram
77W–59L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.02
Sara Fitzpatrick
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.67
Laura Edgerton
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
2.55
3
Cara Garrett
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
2.54
Shannon Vinson
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
2.51
2.5
Amanda Zukowski
48W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%48%52%
2.51
Shauna Alexander
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
2.40
Leah Beatty
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%94%6%
2.29
2.5
Sheffield Kropp
20W–67L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Laurie Yopp
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.