Teams

PC-Marshall

2021 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 MEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-04-25vs YTC-FergusonLost 03
L#1 DoublesGlen Marshall / Scott Smalley vs Robert Darby / Dan Ferguson2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Stromberg / Bryan Coles vs Rick Brown / Stephen Allen4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKenneth Brown / Paul McDaniel vs John Asriel / Gary King4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-04-24vs SC-WillmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Stromberg / Bryan Coles vs Ray Willman / John Omlin4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPaul McDaniel / Kenneth Brown vs Jeffrey Gillespie / Clark Richards4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGlen Marshall / Scott Smalley vs Michael Mainer / John Moloney5-7, 2-6
2021-04-23vs WRAC-WengreenSplit 11
L#2 DoublesBryan Coles / Tim Roloff vs Charles Wengreen / Brian Gundersen2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEmmitt Jackson / Jon Miller vs David Weber / Michael Bordner6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SC-Willman3081472
2WRAC-Wengreen2154982
3PC-Marshall03181699

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Emmitt Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Bryan Coles
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
David Stromberg
published
Glen Marshall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jon Miller
published 0
Kenneth Brown
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Paul McDaniel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Tim Roloff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenneth Brown + Paul McDaniel4552% gamesnot enough data
Bryan Coles + Paul McDaniel3250% gamesnot enough data
Kenneth Brown + Glen Marshall123 matchesnot enough data
Kenneth Brown + Tim Roloff123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emmitt Jackson
48W–46L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
Bryan Coles
38W–48L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
David Stromberg
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Glen Marshall
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
0
Jon Miller
6W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kenneth Brown
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Paul McDaniel
15W–17L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tim Roloff
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.