Teams

Seminole Lakes - Domingo

2025 LEECHARLOTTE Combo 18 & Over Winter · 7.5 W

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesCheryl Domingo / Tina McAtee vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-12vs LEECHAR/DingwallLost 01
L#3 DoublesCheryl Domingo / Sheri Posluszny vs Ann Biever / Cathy O'Neill6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2025-03-05vs Seminole Lakes - KeinerWon 10
W#2 DoublesTheresa Watson / Cheryl Domingo vs Julie Schoettley / Gayle Kloosterman7-5, 6-4
2025-02-26vs UTC- ShotwellLost 01
L#3 DoublesCheryl Domingo / Teresa Mayer vs Lea Zellner / Jane Zito3-6, 1-6
2025-02-12vs Lake Kennedy - RiccioLost 01
L#3 DoublesCathy Hysell / Cheryl Domingo vs Rebecca Henry / Amy Marinell2-6, 0-6
2025-02-05vs LEECHAR/DingwallLost 01
L#3 DoublesCheryl Domingo / Kelly Robertson vs Amanda Patten / Colleen Doyle4-6, 4-6
2025-02-02vs UTC- ShotwellLost 01
L#3 DoublesCheryl Domingo / Cathy Hysell vs Katina Colbert / Jane Zito4-6, 3-6
2025-01-08vs Lake Kennedy - RiccioLost 01
L#2 DoublesSheri Posluszny / Cheryl Domingo vs Heather Humann / Cathrin Matzen6-0, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
3.55
Theresa Watson
published
3.33
Cheryl Domingo
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Sheri Posluszny
published
Cathy Hysell
published 3.5
3.18
Tina McAtee
published
3.00
Kristen Grannell
published
Eva Robertson
published
Jessica Anderson
published
Kelly Robertson
published
Petra Klos
published
Teresa Mayer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlotte Hartman + Tina McAtee134 matchesnot enough data
Petra Klos + Teresa Mayer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charlotte Hartman
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Theresa Watson
4W–14L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Cheryl Domingo
104W–57L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Sheri Posluszny
17W–15L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Cathy Hysell
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tina McAtee
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.18
Kristen Grannell
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Eva Robertson
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Anderson
24W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Robertson
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Petra Klos
23W–31L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Mayer
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.