Teams

Ray 40+ 7.5W

2022 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Women 40 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-09vs Pollina - 40+ 7.5WWon 10
W#2 DoublesYukari Matsuoka / Kim Hunt vs Kimberly Franz / Paula Gebhard6-2, 6-2
2022-10-02vs Kirby 40+ 7.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCari Powell / Kim Hunt vs Lynne Murray / Jennifer Tewksbury6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesErin Huffines / Gina Goy vs Maggie Riley / Kimberly Gay3-6, 1-6
2022-09-18vs Moore/Roach 40+ 7.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesCari Powell / Kim Hunt vs Julie Buchanan / Anne Crutchfield3-6, 4-6
2022-09-17vs McPherson/Cathers 40+ 7.5WWon 10
W#3 DoublesYukari Matsuoka / Kim Hunt vs Julie McPherson / Sarah Vess6-1, 6-2
2022-08-21vs Kirby 40+ 7.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesCari Powell / Kim Hunt vs Diane Majestic / Kimberly Eberhard6-4, 7-5
2022-08-17vs Moore/Roach 40+ 7.5WWon 10
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Bell / Erin Huffines vs Emmy Biaggi / Stephanie Keaney6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Kristin Williamson
published
3.84
Erin Huffines
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.84
Cari Powell
published 4
3.73
Laura Hertweck
published
3.72
Kara Ray
published
3.71
Yukari Matsuoka
published
3.67
Mimi Cartee
published
3.61
Kim Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
Gina Goy
published 4
3.38
Debbie Clancy
published 3.5
Jacqueline Bell
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Hunt + Erin Huffines5556% games+3.5% vs expected
Kara Ray + Cari Powell314 matchesnot enough data
Cari Powell + Gina Goy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Williamson
42W–35L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Erin Huffines
173W–130L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.84
4
Cari Powell
34W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
Laura Hertweck
17W–4L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Kara Ray
17W–9L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Yukari Matsuoka
32W–22L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Mimi Cartee
17W–17L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Kim Hunt
222W–161L career · 8 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Gina Goy
34W–35L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Debbie Clancy
32W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Jacqueline Bell
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.