Teams

CAMPBELL DAY

2025 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 65 & OVER · 4.0 women

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-10vs Hawkins (DAY)Won 21
W#1 DoublesRebecca Durham / Candy Garrett vs Kathleen Bradcovich / Catherine Infante6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMoira Dailey / Elizabeth van Noordt vs Lori Keipper / Michelle Volk2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKim Byrd / Betty Mahoney vs Kathleen Hawkins / Cheryl Matsche6-0, 6-1
2025-04-03vs Hawkins (DAY)Won 30
W#1 DoublesCandy Garrett / Rebecca Durham vs Debbie Canty / Margaret Varga-Roberson7-5, 4-1
W#2 DoublesMoira Dailey / Kim Byrd vs Carrie Guerrette / Michelle Volk6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKathy Drake / Elizabeth van Noordt vs Kathleen Hawkins / Carol Scott6-2, 6-2
2025-03-21vs Hawkins (DAY)Won 21
W#1 DoublesRebecca Durham / Candy Garrett vs Kathleen Bradcovich / Catherine Infante6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMoira Dailey / Sue Griffin vs Debbie Canty / Margaret Varga-Roberson5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathy Drake / Elizabeth van Noordt vs Kelli Brownfield / Beth OConnor6-4, 6-3
2025-03-09vs Hawkins (DAY)Won 30
W#1 DoublesCandy Garrett / Kim Byrd vs Lori Keipper / Kathleen Hawkins6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMoira Dailey / Sue Griffin vs Carrie Guerrette / Michelle Volk6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAnna Martin / Elizabeth van Noordt vs Linda Makowski / Carol Scott6-0, 7-5
2025-02-27vs Hawkins (DAY)Won 21
W#1 DoublesCandy Garrett / Rebecca Durham vs Debbie Canty / Margaret Varga-Roberson7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKathy Drake / Betty Mahoney vs Kathleen Bradcovich / Catherine Infante0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLynn Norris / Elizabeth van Noordt vs Kelli Brownfield / Carrie Guerrette6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Lynn Norris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Candy Garrett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Sue Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Pamela Furr
published
3.45
Kathy Drake
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Betty Mahoney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Elizabeth van Noordt
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Moira Dailey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Norris
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Candy Garrett
23W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
Sue Griffin
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Pamela Furr
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Kathy Drake
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Betty Mahoney
5W–8L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Elizabeth van Noordt
5W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Moira Dailey
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.