Teams

MCL CANDELARIA

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Saturday Ladies 2.5

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-31vs RC REYNOLDS/BARRWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnali Granados / Sharon Ogbonna vs Rachel Lang / Haley Snell6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJen Wagner vs Brooke Green6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAlexis Quan / Caroline Meekins vs Alyssa Foster / Maggie Krenek6-0, 6-1
2025-03-24vs CCC PARKSWon 21
W#1 DoublesErin Hahn / Caroline Meekins vs Tracy Cannell / Alison Conlee6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNilza Boldenow vs Hannah Parks3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesParo Norris / Sharon Ogbonna vs Lee Anne Leonard / Emily Winfrey0-6, 4-6
2025-03-01vs RC REYNOLDS/BARRWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnali Granados / Michelle Ebbens vs Brooke Green / Haley Snell6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNilza Boldenow vs Maggie Krenek7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJen Wagner / Caroline Meekins vs Taylor Reynolds / Alyssa Foster6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-02-23vs CCC PARKSWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichelle Ebbens / Jen Wagner vs Jennifer Omana / Emily Winfrey6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlexis Quan / Erin Hahn vs Hannah Parks / Alison Conlee6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Saturday Ladies 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Jomar Candelaria
published
2.95
Erin Hahn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Alexis Quan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Anali Granados
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Michelle Ebbens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Jen Wagner
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.37
Nilza Boldenow
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Caroline Meekins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.02
Paro Norris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Ogbonna
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anali Granados + Michelle Ebbens5258% games+12.2% vs expected
Alexis Quan + Jen Wagner5358% games+11.8% vs expected
Anali Granados + Jen Wagner224 matchesnot enough data
Alexis Quan + Anali Granados303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jomar Candelaria
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.83
Erin Hahn
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Alexis Quan
20W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.78
3
Anali Granados
22W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.77
Michelle Ebbens
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50
Jen Wagner
17W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%64%36%
2.45
Nilza Boldenow
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%82%18%
2.37
2.5
Caroline Meekins
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paro Norris
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Sharon Ogbonna
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.