Teams

Jo.Hulicki40S

2024 Capital Singles 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-07-28vs Ma.Wood40SSplit 11
L#2 SinglesEdward Maginnis vs Mark Wood2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesSpence Huffstetler vs Osama Said6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-07-21vs Br.Ross40SLost 02
L#1 SinglesSpence Huffstetler vs David Roberts1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJohn Hulicki vs Brent Townsend3-6, 1-6
2024-07-14vs To.Blevins40SWon 20
W#1 SinglesJohn Hulicki vs Jonathan Drum3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesEdward Maginnis vs David Kelly6-4, 6-2
2024-07-13vs To.Blevins40SLost 01
L#2 SinglesEdward Maginnis vs Ryan Busey0-6, 4-6
2024-07-01vs Ma.Wood40SSplit 11
L#2 SinglesStephen Cole vs Mark Wood6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJohn Hulicki vs Jason Prabel6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-06-23vs Br.Ross40SLost 01
L#1 SinglesEdward Maginnis vs Brent Townsend2-6, 2-6
2024-06-16vs To.Blevins40SWon 20
W#1 SinglesJohn Hulicki vs Douglas Marks5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesStephen Cole vs Ian Campbell6-3, 6-4
2024-06-09vs Ma.Wood40SLost 12
W#1 SinglesEdward Maginnis vs Jason Prabel7-6, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJohn Hulicki vs Mark Wood4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesStephen Cole vs Ted Lotchin2-6, 2-6
2024-06-02Won 10
W#2 SinglesJohn Hulicki vs James Wu5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Aaron Earwood
published 4
3.44
Edward Maginnis
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.41
John Hulicki
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Spence Huffstetler
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Stephen Cole
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.92
Jeffrey Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edward Maginnis + Spence Huffstetler4448% gamesnot enough data
Edward Maginnis + John Hulicki1447% gamesnot enough data
Jeffrey Miller + John Hulicki134 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Cole + John Hulicki314 matchesnot enough data
Spence Huffstetler + John Hulicki224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aaron Earwood
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
3.5
Edward Maginnis
61W–79L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
John Hulicki
162W–114L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
3.41
3.5
Spence Huffstetler
65W–73L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Stephen Cole
68W–61L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.25
Jeffrey Miller
18W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.